Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  84 / 648 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 84 / 648 Next Page
Page Background

Safety and environmental standards for fuel storage sites

Final report

83

8 There are several ways of describing a hazardous scenario. The simplest convention is to

include in the description:

the unwanted serious event (the consequence); and

its potential cause or causes (initiating event(s)).

9 Hazardous scenarios can be derived by a number of techniques, eg Hazard and Operability

Studies (HAZOP), Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and What If. These studies will

typically provide at least one initiating event, a high level description of the consequences (although

details of the severity are rarely provided) and may also provide information on the safeguards.

Figure 21

Relationship of LOPA technique to other risk assessment methodologies

10 Once the hazardous scenario has been identified, the LOPA proceeds by defining and

quantifying the initiating events (including any enabling events and conditions) more fully and then

identifying and quantifying the effectiveness of the protection layers and conditional modifiers which

may prevent the scenario from developing or allow it to develop to the defined consequence.

11 It is helpful to adopt a systematic approach to identifying the critical factors which will prevent

the initiating event from leading to a loss of containment and those which, once containment is

lost, will prevent the undesired consequence from occurring. Essentially, this means considering

the analysis in terms of a bow-tie diagram, with the LOPA being the aggregation of a number of

individual paths through the bow-tie diagram which result in the same undesired consequence.

12 It is also important to adopt a systematic approach to identifying the consequence of interest

for the LOPA from the range of possible outcomes. Annex 2 shows the right-hand side of a bow-

tie diagram representing a possible range of consequences to the environment from the overflow

of a storage tank.

13 The critical factors can then be divided between prevention protection layers (on the left-hand

side of the bow-tie), mitigation protection layers (on the right-hand side of the bow-tie) and conditional

modifiers. Further guidance on protection layers and conditional modifiers is given later in this report.

Increasing complexity

Increasing conservatism

Quantified Risk

Assessment

Fault Tree

Analysis

Complex

LOPA

Human Reliability

Assessment

Simple order

of magnitude

LOPA

Risk

graph