Previous Page  156 / 432 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 156 / 432 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

APRIL

1994

of the Law Schools in the Universities

had produced a paper arguing in

favour of this view. He believed that

the Law Society was under pressure to

respond to this. The Council took the

view that it would not be possible to

formulate a concrete response before

the outcome of the Solicitors

(Amendment) Bill, 1994, but that the

Society should continue to defend its

own role in the professional training

of solicitors.

The Chairman of the Education

Committee reported to Council that

some universities were now seeking

exemption from the FE-1 for new law

degrees they had introduced, for

example, mixing law and languages.

The Education Committee, he said,

was disposed to exempting the

degrees subject to a proper system of

certification being in place i.e. that the

universities would certify that the

course content was in accordance with

the syllabus laid down by the Law

Society. The Council decided that this

matter needed further consideration

and it was adjourned to the next

meeting.

Consumer Credit Bill

Elma Lynch,

Chairman of the

Parliamentary Committee, reported

that the Consumer Credit Bill was

currently being debated in Dail

Eireann. The Bill had been examined

by the Company Law Committee and

a submission had been made to the

Department of Enterprise and

Employment. In particular,

representations were made concerning

the definition of "mortgage

intermediary" in section 96 of the Bill

as there was concern that solicitors

might fall within the definition. There

was similar concern about the

definition of "credit intermediary" in

section 2. She reported that the

Society had sought an exemption for

solicitors from the scope of both

definitions.

Proposal To 'Cap' Personal Injury

Awards

The Director General reported on a

meeting that he and the President had

had with an official of the Department

of Industry and Commerce, at which

they had pointed out the difficulties

the Society foresaw in trying to devise

a system of capping compensation

awards that would be fair or workable.

The Society had discussed a number

of other measures that could be taken

to reduce the cost of insurance in this

country. The President and the

Director General had reiterated fully

the Society's opposition to any

proposals to limit compensation

awards.

The Director General also reported

that he and the President had met with

the Irish Congress of Trade Unions. It

had been a useful meeting and the

ICTU officials had made it clear that

they were not in favour of reducing

compensation levels but had indicated

that they were seeking a change in the

law so that compensation payable to a

worker would not be reduced where it

was found that the worker had

contributed to an accident by his own

negligence. They favoured in

principle the introduction of a no-fault

system of compensation.

Half-Yearly General Meeting of

the Society

The Council considered three motions

which had been set down by members j

of the profession for debate under

special business at the Half-yearly

General Meeting which would be held

at the Annual Conference of the

Society on 12 May. It was noted, in

relation to the first motion, which

I

sought to discuss the substantial

increase in the membership

subscription/registration fee for the

current year, that the accounts for

1993 had been finalised and were

being circulated to all members of the

profession along with an explanatory

memorandum from the Chairman of

the Finance Committee.

Commenting on the second special

business motion, which sought to

discuss any change of annual

contribution to the Compensation

Fund whereby different classes of

solicitors would contribute at different

rates, the President of the Society

noted that at the Committee Stage of

the debate on the Solicitors

(Amendment) Bill, 1994, there would

be a motion from the Opposition to

delete section 30(2) of the Bill that

would permit the Society to prescribe

different rates of contribution to the

Fund in relation to any class of

solicitor. The President noted that it

was the policy of the Council to

oppose different rates of contribution

to the Fund.

The third motion of special business

sought to discuss the concept of fee-

sharing arrangements between

solicitors and persons not qualified to

practise as solicitors. The Council

noted that there continued to be strong

opposition in the profession to the

introduction of provisions that would

permit the establishment of multi-

disciplinary partnerships.

a

B e t t e r l i g h t a c a n d l e

t h a n c u r s e t h e

d a r k n e s s

Muriel O'Donnell,

Solicitor, is

involved in fundraising efforts to

provide aid in Bosnia. She writes:

"Richard Hunt

and

Martin Keogh

are

both unemployed professional drivers.

Early last year, having watched on

television the horrific scenes in

Bosnia, they bought a 12 year old

ambulance, filled it with supplies

donated by the public and drove

it into the middle of the war zone.

They have now completed six

deliveries of much-needed aid and are

planning a seventh journey as soon as

sufficient funds can be raised. Medical

supplies are extremely scarce.

A bottle of Calpol (used to treat fever

in children) can fetch £70 on the

black market. Antibiotics are like

gold dust.

A fund-raising effort is under way. A

quiz night will be held in the

Presidents' Hall, The Law Society on

18 May at 8 pm (£24 per table of 4).

Please send what you can to Non-Stop

Aid, Bank of Ireland, Rathcoole,

A/c No. 41328723, sort code 901298."

Muriel O 'Donnell, Solicitor.

132