\\
TSOs were also observed to have improved
in fulfilling and/or exceeding transparency
obligations towards network users for better
balancing of portfolios.
\\
A change towards the usage of another
trading platform for balancing purposes has
been reported by one country. The trading
platform as well as the plan to implement
one directly instead of the interim measure
in place was also reported. Delays in imple-
menting trading platforms were observed in
two countries applying transitory period.
\\
17 countries indicated having implemented
the merit order in accordance with Art. 9
with STSPs in first place of the merit order.
The decision process for implementing ST-
SPs and/or balancing services was finalised
in many countries by 1 October 2016. One
country indicated that it no longer offered
any balancing services. Two other countries
reported a change to the merit order due to
introduction of different products for emer-
gency cases. The annual review of balanc-
ing services was confirmed by ten of 15
countries who reported performing balanc-
ing services in their current merit order.
\\
The information provisions according Art.
32 BAL NC (3 types of information) are pro-
vided by 19 countries and partially by five
countries.
\\
Information model: The on-going imple-
mentation regarding the provision of infor-
mation on forecasts, updates and alloca-
tions can be noticed as several updates or
new implementation have been reported by
different countries by 1 October 2016. For
example, some countries provide more fre-
quent updates than the minimum foreseen
by BAL NC whereas some other countries
have still not designated an information
model and/or the forecasting party.
\\
The cost benefit analysis (CBA) deadline
regarding the information provisions passed
in April 2016. Most countries indicated a
CBA was currently in progress or being
postponed into the future. Nevertheless the
implementation or the improvement of
information provisions was reported in sev-
eral countries.
\\
14 countries reported the implementation
of daily imbalance charge provisions while
three countries partially implemented them.
In one country the methodology is still
under development. Three other countries
reported recently the application of an inter-
im imbalance charge, so that in total eight
countries applied this interim measure. Of
them, seven countries stated that the inter-
im imbalance charge was implemented by
1 October 2016 while one plans to imple-
ment it during 2017.
\\
14 countries reported the implementation
of the methodology for calculation of neu-
trality charges. Three countries have anoth-
er approved neutrality mechanism in place
which fulfils the principals of neutrality as
foreseen in BAL NC. Another 6 countries
have partially implemented the neutrality
provisions while the methodology is still un-
der discussion for two further countries.
\\
Of the five countries that have already
implemented WDOs, one country stated a
change in its WDO regime regarding the
calculation of WDO charges. Another
country is still planning the establishment of
WDOs.
\\
Five countries reported to have already
offered linepack flexibility service by
1 October 2016. Of these, one country has
partially implemented the provisions. Of
three countries that were discussing the
introduction of the linepack flexibility
service or foreseen before, only one chose
to finally implement it.
\\
Of the eleven countries applying for interim
measures, one country indicated having
moved forwards from planned towards
implementation of interim measures while
another country postponed the implemen-
tation into 2017. Other countries reported
having implemented additional interim
imbalance charge since the previous report.
Four countries updated and published the
interim measure report.
ENTSOG BAL NC Monitoring Report 2016 |
7