Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  7 / 596 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 7 / 596 Next Page
Page Background

EXPERT REVIEW PANEL (ERP) FOR MICROBIOLOGY FOR FOOD AND ENVIRONMENTAL SURFACES

*Agenda is subject to change. V3

Page 1 of 1

AOAC INTERNATIONAL Headquarters

2275 Research Blvd, Suite 300

Rockville, Maryland 20850

Friday, June 10, 2016

8:30AM – 12:00PM (EST)

Meeting Room: Boardroom

MEETING AGENDA

Expert Review Panel Co-Chairs: Wendy McMahon, Silliker, Inc. and Michael Brodsky, Brodsky Consultants

I.

Welcome and Introductions

Expert Review Panel Co-Chairs

II.

Review of AOAC Volunteer Policies & Expert Review Panel Process Overview and Guidelines

Deborah McKenzie, Senior Director, Standards Development and Method Approval Processes, AOAC

INTERNATIONAL and AOAC Research Institute

III.

Review of Methods

For each method the assigned ERP members will present a review of the proposed collaborative study manuscript,

after which the ERP will discuss the method and render a decision on the status for each method.

1)

OMAMAN-29: Evaluation Of 3M™ Molecular Detection Assay 2 -

Listeria

For The Detection Of

Listeria

In

Selected Foods And Environmental Surfaces: Collaborative Study

Co-Study Directors: Lisa Monteroso, 3M Food Safety, 3M Center, Building 260-06B-01, St. Paul, MN 55144

and Erin Crowley, Q Laboratories, 1400 Harrison Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45214

2)

OMAMAN-30: Evaluation Of 3M™ Molecular Detection Assay 2 -

Listeria Monocytogenes

For The

Detection Of

Listeria Monocytogenes

In Selected Foods And Environmental Surfaces: Collaborative Study

Co-Study Directors: Lisa Monteroso, 3M Food Safety, 3M Center, Building 260-06B-01, St. Paul, MN 55144

and Erin Crowley, Q Laboratories, 1400 Harrison Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45214

IV.

Discuss Final Action Requirements for First Action Official Methods

(if applicable)

ERP will discuss, review and track First Action methods for 2 years after adoption, review any additional information

(i.e., additional collaborative study data, proficiency testing, and other feedback) and make recommendations to

the Official Methods Board regarding Final Action status.

V.

Adjournment