Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  164 / 772 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 164 / 772 Next Page
Page Background

18

In recent years, fund companies have experimented

with various ways of closing funds. One thing I’ve

seen more often is funds closing their doors halfway.

They close the fund to investors using fund super-

markets but leave them open to those who invest

directly with the fund company.

This really serves two purposes. First, it slows down

the rate of inflows. Second, it leaves more profits

for the fund company because it doesn’t have to pay

a No Transaction Fee plan provider like Schwab

or Fidelity the usual

35

basis points in fees. I don’t

really mind the practice, except that whenever I

write about those funds, some readers complain to

me that the funds are closed because that’s what

it says when you pull up the fund in the

NTF

supermarkets. So to clear the decks, I thought I’d

write about a few of the very best funds in this

camp. If you don’t already have an account with that

firm, you’ve got to decide whether it’s worth the

extra difficulty of having another account.

AMG Yacktman Focused

YAFFX

and AMG

Yacktman

YACKX

The funds have transitioned largely from Donald

Yacktman to his son Stephen Yacktman, but we still

give them Morningstar Analyst Ratings of Silver

and Gold, respectively. They saw a surge in popu-

larity that prompted them to close the funds to

NTF

programs a few years ago. And that’s a good

thing; they run focused portfolios, yet assets

grew to more than

$10

billion in both funds. Since

then, the funds have lost some luster; they’ve

lagged their peers significantly over the trailing

three- and five-year periods. However, I don’t blame

the transition or the asset growth.

Instead, it’s really a matter of style. The managers

are cautious value investors who will build cash

if they can’t find enough attractive investments. It’s

a fine strategy for protecting against the down-

side, but it means the funds will lag in a rally. Maybe

asset size is a bit of a hindrance, but I doubt

it’s playing a major role. In any case, both funds

are now in redemptions.

AMG

Yacktman Focused

saw

$1

.

9

billion in outflows over the past

12

months, and

AMG

Yacktman has had

$1

.

2

billion

go out the door. The difference in their analyst

ratings is because

AMG

Yacktman Focused charges

a full

50

basis points more than

AMG

Yacktman.

Oakmark Global

OAKGX

Managers Clyde McGregor and Rob Taylor ply the

Oakmark strategy across the planet. They want strong

businesses trading for cheap prices. They look to

same-industry buyouts to verify the correct multiples

for companies. The portfolio has mostly classic value

names like

Union Pacific

UNP

and

Credit Suisse

CS

, but there are some growth favorites like Samsung

thrown in to boot. Over time they’ve produced excel-

lent relative performance in bear and bull markets

alike. The fund is still getting a trickle of inflows with

$120

million in inflows over the past

12

months.

Vanguard Wellington

VWELX

This remains one of the great bargains of the fund

world. You can tap Wellington’s great stock and

bond management resources for just

0

.

26%

a year.

It, too, has had very few missteps. Flows have

slowed to

$463

million in the past year, and that’s

a good thing for a

$91

billion fund.

Wasatch Small Cap Growth

WAAEX

Jeff Cardon has built a remarkable record over nearly

30

years at this fund. He looks for financially

healthy companies with strong growth potential,

but he pays attention to valuations, too. My

greatest concern is that Cardon could retire sometime

soon, even though he says he has no plans to do

so. The fund also has a wild card in the form of a

9%

stake in India, which is pretty unusual for a

U.S.

small-cap fund.

œ

Closed, Not Closed

Tracking Morningstar Analyst Ratings

|

Russel Kinnel

What Are Morningstar

Analyst Ratings?

Our ratings are chosen for long-

term success. Analysts assess

a fund’s competitive advantages

by analyzing people, process,

parent, performance, and price.

They do rigorous analysis and

then submit their ratings to a

committee that vets their work

for thoroughness and consistency.