Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  449 / 772 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 449 / 772 Next Page
Page Background

15

Morningstar FundInvestor

October 2015

private equity firms, which means the family that

founded First Eagle will be a minority shareholder

for the first time. This could put the firm’s corporate

culture at risk.

“The firm has its merits. It offers a limited number of

mutual funds, all of which share a distinctive value

orientation. Four of the funds—Global, Overseas, U.S.

Value, and Gold—are run by its global-value team.

First Eagle High Yield is run by a fixed-income group

that First Eagle absorbed in

2011

, and the family’s

newest offering, First Eagle Global Income Builder, is

run by both the global-value team and the fixed-

income team. First Eagle Fund of America is run by

a subadvisor.

“The firm has moved past upheaval before, especially

after a

2007

change on the global-value team. The

team has been relatively stable since then, though

veteran manager Abhay Deshpande departed in

2014

and there has been some analyst turnover. One other

negative: First Eagle Global has been allowed to grow

to more than

$45

billion, impeding its ability to take

sizable stakes in smaller-cap stocks (typical here under

former longtime skipper Jean-Marie Eveillard).”

PIMCO One Year Later

In the initial wake of Bill Gross’ resignation from

PIMCO

—less than nine months after

CEO

and co-

CIO

Mohamed El-Erian himself decided to leave—the

biggest questions revolved around the future of the

firm, when and how it would stabilize, and whether it

would see an exodus of investment staff. While those

questions aren’t entirely settled, there have been

some good signs. Here is Eric Jacobson’s take on it:

“Once the largest mutual fund in the world,

PIMCO

Total Return

PTTRX

has since shrunk considerably,

recently sliding under the

$100

billion mark as

combined outflows from Sept.

1

,

2014

, through August

2015

totaled roughly

$124

billion. (Gross left on Sept.

26

,

2014

, but outflows over the last three days of the

month were massive.) Those redemptions have abated

some—the

$2

billion that left in August

2015

was

the lowest monthly figure since Gross resigned—and

shouldn’t be hard for a firm with

PIMCO

’s significant

resources to manage at that level. But the outflows

haven’t yet stopped, much less reversed. From May

through August

2015

, they comprised nearly

8%

of its

assets, while flows out of the overall intermediate-term

bond Morningstar Category were a more modest

3

.

5%

.

PIMCO

Total Return’s portfolio certainly looks different

from a year ago. However, that’s to be expected given

the firm’s evolving macro view. There’s little evidence,

meanwhile, that group head Dan Ivascyn (Gross’

successor in the

CIO

role) and this fund’s management

crew are really doing anything significantly different

from what Bill Gross had done while in charge. That’s

not surprising, given that they were a crucial engine

behind his success for so many years. The fund boasts

notable large-currency and emerging-markets bonds

positions, but it is reassuring that, while there are limi-

tations to all models, stress tests, and expected levels

of volatility,

PIMCO

has demonstrated a knack as good

as any for developing useful tools while not overre-

lying on any of them to be fail-safe.

“The most notable changes in the portfolio’s exposures

have been adjustments to the fund’s currency

exposures, which comprised a short position against

foreign currencies totaling

11

.

2%

at the end of

August

2015

. By contrast, until right after Gross’ depar-

ture at the end of September

2014

, the fund’s overall

currency exposure hadn’t deviated by more than

5%

in

either direction around the dollar since August

2011

and most recently hadn’t crossed more than

1

.

5

percen-

tage points.

“For those with a long-enough memory, the specter of

that much currency risk in a core bond fund can

easily become a source of angst. Currencies can go

through long periods of muted volatility, but when

they are volatile they can be much more so than bonds.

In the early

1990

s, for example, the Japanese yen

posted rolling three-year standard deviations in the

10%

range—already well ahead of most bond

indexes—and spiked up to around

16%

thanks in

large part to an Asian crisis set off in part by the

devaluation of the Thai baht in

1998

. The euro has

had its moments, too, with its trailing volatility

briefly hitting similar heights in

2011

around the time

that trouble in Greece began to call into question

the future of the euro.”

K