Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  124 / 373 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 124 / 373 Next Page
Page Background

38p

The GTA owns a percentage of the City's total investment pool. Accordingly, investment balances of the GTA are included

in the following table:

Valuation Measurement

Weighted Average

Investment Type

Method

Reported/Fair Value

Maturity (Year)

U.S. Government Agencies

Fair Value - Level 2

246,815,204

$

1.48

Commercial Paper

Fair Value - Level 2

9,958,983

0.0003

OPEB - STIF

Amortized Cost

3,932,561

0.003

OPEB - LTIF

Fair Value - Level 2

1,665,344

0.003

OPEB - Equity

Fair Value - Level 1

9,581,656

0.003

NCCMT Cash Portfolio

Amortized Cost

33,369,226

0.003

NCCMT TermFund

Fair Value - Level 1

10,564,204

0.003

Total Fair Value

315,887,178

$

Portfolio Weighted Average Maturity

0.51

All investments are measured using the market approach: using prices and other relevant information generated by market

transactions involving identical or comparable assets or a group of assets.

Level of fair value hierarchy:

Level 1: Financial instruments are valued using directly observable, quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical

assets.

Level 2: Financial instruments are valued using inputs that include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active

markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of

the financial instrument.

The Street Improvements Bond Fund-Series 2010 has $1,206,639 in checks in excess of cash and the Parks & Recreation-

Series 2008 has $2,082 in checks in excess of cash, which are reflected in the liability section of these financial statements.

Interest Rate Risk

In accordance with the formal approved City of Greensboro’s Charter, Article III, Section 4.71, the Investment Manager

(Assistant Treasurer) prepares a memo describing investment transactions in detail as they are purchased. This memo is sent

to the Mayor, the City Manager and the Finance Director (Treasurer) for signature approval and then returned to the

Investment Manager. Although the investment policy has not been formally approved by the City Council, the City has an

investment policy guideline, an internally approved Finance Department document that follows North Carolina General

Statute 159-30. As a means of limiting the City’s exposure to declines in fair market values from rising interest rates, the

City limits the weighted average maturity of its investments to less than 3.5 years. Also, the City purchases securities in a

structured ladder with stated maturity dates to limit interest rate risk.

Credit Risk

North Carolina General Statute 159-30 limits investments in U.S. Governmental Agencies and commercial paper to those

with top ratings issued by NRSRS. The City has no formal investment policy regarding credit risk, however in practice, it

follows NCGS 159-30, and in effect the City limits its investment types to those with top ratings issued by NRSRS. As of

June 30, 2016, the City had investments in the NCCMT Cash Portfolio, which is rated AAAm by Standard and Poor’s, and in

U. S. Government Agencies, all of which were rated AAA by Standard and Poor’s. The City also had investments in the

NCCMT Term Portfolio, which is not rated. Investments in commercial paper by the City are rated either A1/P1 by Standard

and Poor’s or Moody’s Investors Service.

Custodial Credit Risk

For an investment, the custodial risk is the risk that in the event of the failure of the counterparty, the City will not be able to

recover the value of its investments or collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party. The City has no

formal policy on custodial credit risk, but the City utilizes a separate third party custodial trust agent for all book-entry

transactions, all of which are held in the City’s name.