Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  42 / 64 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 42 / 64 Next Page
Page Background

40

Wire & Cable ASIA – July/August 2016

www.read-wca.com

From the Americas

Closed, idled, at-risk USA smelters

There is no denying that American and other aluminium

firms are restructuring and cutting back on production

in current conditions of imbalance in global supply and

demand. In what it describes as an efficiency initiative,

Alcoa, the foremost American aluminium producer, has

announced the closing of a series of domestic smelters

as it relies more heavily on production in Canada, Iceland

and Saudi Arabia. At the same time, Canadian and other

smelters have stepped up shipments of raw aluminium to

the United States.

“In states all across the country, America’s aluminium

producers have closed, idled or are at risk,” said USW

international president Leo W Gerard at the time of the ITC

filing.

“In 2011 there were 14 smelters in the United States.

Today there are only eight, of which only five are currently

operating. [One of these was expected to be idled by the

end of June.] Two of the five now operating are at 50 per

cent or less of capacity.”

For its part, China – whose exports to the United States are

an important source of domestic employment – professes

innocence of wrongdoing. While its own customs figures

show a jump in exports of aluminium of more than 27 per

cent over the past two years, the government-affiliat-

ed China Aluminium Association takes the position that

an increasing need for aluminium in high-speed railway

equipment, aerospace and electronics justifies an expansion

in Chinese production capacity and an incidental rise in

exports.

Section 201 cases are not easy to win, requiring

proof not merely of injury but of “serious injury” to a

domestic industry from imports; and even if it prevails

the USW case would take some time to produce any

real effect. Meanwhile, presidential aspirant Donald

J Trump’s populist appeals for tougher USA trade

policies, including a steep tariff on goods from China,

attracted attention in China this spring. During a visit to

Washington in April, Chinese finance minister Lou Jiwei

told the

Wall Street Journal

that the imposition of such a

tariff would violate World Trade Organization rules.

Steel

In tandem to the tensions over aluminium,

low-priced Chinese exports continue to

roil the steel market

A senior official in the China Iron & Steel Association

(CISA) has rejected the charge that China bears any

special responsibility for the over-supply of steel in the

world. Speaking to the

Wall Street Journal

on the sidelines

of an industry conference held in Hong Kong in April,

Li Xinchuang, the vice secretary general of the China Iron

& Steel Association (CISA), claimed that overcapacity in

the steel industry is a global phenomenon. “It is not only a

situation in China,” said Mr Li. “We have both good quality

and price. It is not about price alone.”

He further told the

WSJ

’s Asia correspondent Biman

Mukherji that China would hit back at any increase in

tariffs on its steel exports imposed by other countries. Said

Mr Li, “We are against anti-dumping action and we will

take measures.” (“China’s Steel Body Sees Red Over Tariff

Measures to Stall Exports,” 6

th

April)

In March, the US Department of Commerce imposed

preliminary duties on imports of cold rolled steel, used

extensively to make auto parts, from seven countries

including China, whose steel imports received a 265.79 per

cent tariff.

India last year raised import taxes on steel by five

percentage points to 12.5 per cent on flat products and

10 per cent on long products. It also added a temporary

20 per cent “safeguard” duty on hot rolled coils after local

producers claimed to have suffered damage from cheap

imports.

On 19

th

April it became apparent that China is

doubling down on its disavowal of responsibility in

the matter of steel over-supply. One day after the

major steel-producing countries, meeting in Brussels,

acknowledged failure to come together on a remedy, a

spokesman for China’s Ministry of Commerce betrayed

some exasperation.

“China has already done more than enough [to reduce

capacity in its steel sector],” Shen Danyang told

reporters in Beijing. “What more do you want us to do?”

The reference would have been to the 2.3 per cent

cutback in Chinese steel production (to 803.8 million

metric tons) last year, the first drop since 1981.

According to Reuters, the current drive by Beijing to cut

industrial capacity will force China to lay off some 1.8

million coal and steel workers. The central government

will allocate $15.5 billion to cushion the effect of the job

losses and to discharge debt.

Elsewhere in steel

As reported in the

Northwest Indiana Times

(1

st

April),

the Korean steel producer Posco is seeking final

local approval and property tax abatement for a new

120,000-square-foot wire rod processing plant in the

Port of Indiana-Jeffersonville. The $19 million project

– a joint venture with JP Steel, also Korean – would

be Posco’s second USA plant. Kyu Tae Kim, the

company’s finance director, said the plant would supply

its automotive customers on a just-in-time (JIT) delivery

basis.

The Posco announcement came a day after

Delaware-based Nuco Steel Bar Technologies said it

was investing $36.9 million to build a 150,000ft

2

bar

mill in Valparaiso, Indiana. Construction was to begin in

May, with completion set for sometime in 2017. Target

sectors are automotive, agricultural, hydraulic, and tool

manufacturing.

As noted on

thesteelreport.com

(29

th

March), Nuco

claims to be building “the most advanced cold draw

bar mill in North America,” with continuous processing

capability.