Previous Page  54 / 101 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 54 / 101 Next Page
Page Background

Biophysics in the Understanding, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Infectious Diseases Poster Abstracts

49

1-POS

Board 1

Computational Simulation of Mechanical Interactions between a Cell and its Environment

Considering Focal Adhesions and Substrate Stiffness

Tamer Abdalrahman

1

, Laura Dubuis

1,2

, Neil Davies

2

, Jason Green

2

, Thomas Franz

1

.

1

Division of Biomedical Engineering, University of Cape Town, Observatory, Western Cape,

South Africa,

2

Cardiovascular Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Observatory, Western

Cape, South Africa.

Introduction

Cell and viral mechanics including cell-environment, cell-cell and cell-virion interactions may

play important roles in aetiology of infectious diseases. Exploring these interactions

experimentally is often challenging, and computational modelling offers a complementary

approach of inquiry.

Methods

The three-dimensional geometry of a fibroblast, distinguishing cytosol and nucleus, was

reconstructed from confocal micrographs (ScanIP, Simpleware Ltd, Exeter, UK) of a cell

cultured two-dimensionally and stained with phalloidin (for actin fibres) and Hoechst (for

nucleus). The geometry was imported in ABAQUS 6.12 (Dassault Systèmes, Providence, USA)

and complemented with a 0.01 μm thick membrane enveloping the cytosol and a flat substrate

(thickness: 10 μm). Focal adhesions (FA) were represented with estimated sizes and locations

using cohesive elements. Mechanical properties of the cell components from literature were

used, and the elastic modulus of the substrate was varied (E

Sub

= 0.01, 0.14, 1, and 10 MPa). The

substrate was stretched to λ = 1.1 (equivalent to a strain of 9.5e

-2

) and the resulting deformation

of the cell was assessed for different substrate moduli.

Results

The largest maximum principal strain predicted for E

Sub

= 0.01, 0.14, 1, and 10 MPa,

respectively, was 4.58e

-4

, 5.27e

-4

, 5.33e

-4

and 5.34e

-4

in the membrane, 1.18e

-3

, 1.33e

-3

, 1.34e

-

3

and 1.34e

-3

in the cytosol, 6.88e

-6

, 8.17e

-6

, 8.27e

-6

and 8.29e

-6

in the nucleus, and 1.87, 1.96,

1.97 and 1.97 in the FA.

Discussion

The maximum FA strains are likely to be overestimated due to absence of a detachment criterion

in the FA formulation. Nevertheless, the results indicate increased cell deformation with

increased substrate modulus for a simple case and present a point of departure for the

advancement of the models and methods towards the assessment of more complex in cell and

virion mechanics.