Previous Page  11 / 44 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 11 / 44 Next Page
Page Background

ACQ

uiring knowledge

in

speech

,

language and hearing

, Volume 10, Number 2 2008

45

Work– l i f e balance : preserv i ng your soul

In conjunction with my boss, the District Guidance Officer,

we tackled the issue of how to provide a service across the

entire district. Using the models described above, we would

seed services in the schools in larger country towns around

Cairns. When a service was up and running, it would be

withdrawn, citing distance, weather and road conditions as

barriers to sustaining it. (Occasionally this was true – I once

had two weeks “flood leave” when all roads out of my

northern beach home were cut by floods.) The power of rural

communities to influence government policy and spending

was considerable in Queensland in the 1970s, and repre­

sentations by schools and community members to relevant

parliamentarians would lead to creation of a new speech

therapy position. In just a few years, the service grew from

one (me) to five speech therapists in the district.

One aspect of service delivery in FNQ that gave me

particular pleasure was providing consultations over the

School of the Air radio from the Flying Doctor base in Cairns.

Teachers would occasionally ask me to “listen to this kid on

the radio and tell me if he needs speech therapy”. This was no

easy task given the static on the radio but a short conversation

with child and then parent could sometimes establish the

need for a referral to the Bush Children’s Health Scheme in

Townsville for assessment and intensive therapy, or a visit to

me next time they were in Cairns. Because I had grown up in

“the bush”, I had great sympathy for the isolation and

distance faced by these families and would happily come into

the clinic for an evening or weekend consultation if they

happened to come to Cairns at short notice for other reasons.

In recent years, this interest in equity of opportunity for

access to services has motivated my research with Telstra into

the use of low-tech telehealth, using the IT and computers

already available in the homes of many remote Australian

families (Wilson, McAllister, Atkinson & Sefton, 2006;

McAllister, Wilson & Atkinson, 2008).

Another strategy for providing services to large numbers of

children, teachers and schools was to involve as many speech

therapy students as I could in my work. I asked the University

of Queensland to send me students whenever they could,

particularly in the school holidays. If students came in term

time, they were exposed to the models of indirect service

delivery I described above. They found this a great challenge

as it was outside their experience to date. If the students came

during school holidays, we would run intensive one-to-one

and group therapy programs for children who needed direct

therapy. The students served not only as many extra pairs of

hands, but also as a lifeline for me to new ideas, resources,

journals, and so on. In essence, they were my professional

development program, and I remain gratefully in touch with

many of them to this day.

I had a wonderful five years in Cairns, interrupted by a

year at Western Michigan University to complete a Masters in

and all the children who potentially required a service. It

would have been easy to continue to do “the same old thing”

because expectations of me were low. Had I stayed in “my

clinic”, I might have been simply fulfilling the first two of

three prevailing views held by many teachers of the day: that

speech therapists “spent term 1 assessing, term 2 doing “a bit

of therapy”, and term 3 getting pregnant and leaving”.

However, I seized the opportunity to do things differently,

spent little time in the clinic, and almost serendipitously

found myself pioneering new ways of providing services

across large areas.

Through trial and error in the first year, I developed a plan

for rotating through schools on a term basis, typically 2–3

schools each term. Schools would be responsible for

identifying children of concern using a checklist I had

developed. There was excellent support from the local schools

for my work. At large seminars organised by the schools and

conducted at the local teachers’ resource centre, I regularly

explained how to use the checklist to identify, refer and work

with children with speech and language problems in the

classroom. At the start of a school’s target term, I would do

screening assessments of all referred children, and use carbon

paper to leave summary reports and suggested goals with the

school on the same day. I would return in the next few weeks

to run workshops on “how to help children with speech and

language problems” in staff meeting times, and to meet with

teachers about how we jointly could achieve these goals,

preferably in the classroom. This might involve developing a

program for the teacher, aide, parent or volunteer. If the

teacher was willing, I would come into the classroom and co-

teach an activity with in-built listening, and speech or language

goals which would benefit the whole class as well as the

target children. I would endeavour to see parents and explain

their children’s needs and programs, providing additional home

practice where possible. Once programs were running, I could

move onto the next school, returning to the previous school

on a fixed intermittent schedule to check on progress, adapt

programs and so on. A school could expect to see a lot of me one

term, less the next, and only once or twice for “check ups” in

the third term. I was always available to teachers and parents

by phone on the day a week I spent in the office.

The approach to service delivery I developed was a com­

bination of what we now refer to as block or cycle therapy,

collaborative consultation and co-teaching. These initiatives

were reported in more depth in McAllister (1985). I did also

provide more extensive assessments and traditional one-to-

one therapy for children who required this, for example those

with severe speech impairments (e.g., post-cleft palate sur­

gery, dyspraxia), and voice disorders. Children who stuttered

I took to the Education Department clinic in Townsville

during school holidays for an intensive program , and in later

years I ran intensive group therapy with my new speech

therapy colleague at the Cairns Base Hospital.

Electronic copies of

ACQ

Speech Pathology Australia members are able to access past and present

issues of

ACQ

via the Speech Pathology Australia website.

www.speechpathologyaustralia.org.au

Hard copies are available to everyone (members and non members)

at a cost by emailing

pubs@speechpathologyaustralia.org.au.