Previous Page  35 / 44 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 35 / 44 Next Page
Page Background

ACQ

uiring knowledge

in

speech

,

language and hearing

, Volume 10, Number 2 2008

69

Work– l i f e balance : preserv i ng your soul

Our team usually offers one-on-one therapy in blocks of 5

weeks (i.e., once a week for 5 weeks) followed by a “break”.

We have found that this schedule is a much more effective

manner of service delivery than our previous fortnightly or

monthly service. Subjectively, we have observed that clients

can make gains in consolidation during the “break” from

direct therapy. This approach has allowed us to provide more

frequent and consistent service and increased our discharge

rates. This type of service delivery has also increased our

sense of job satisfaction and has allowed clients to experience

success and the time they need to consolidate their skills.

The changes to funding structures and the increasing

demands on our service, as well as the flow-on effects of

pressures on Early Intervention services has encouraged our

team to seek out and further develop and implement a new

oral language program. And this has led to two members of

the team to take on a network-funded research project on col­

laborative approaches to language in the classroom and their

own study into the effectiveness of this collaborative approach.

The very nature of communication cannot occur in isolation

and the education setting is no exception. The collaborative

approach is something that is vital to us and we could not

work in schools without the excellent support we get from the

teachers, integration aides and other school staff in our

schools. The willingness of teachers to provide support for the

therapy of their students is always welcome. The enthusiasm

that integration aides have when they participate in therapy

sessions is also invaluable. This team approach that we take to

our students when we work with teachers and integration

aides is a vital ingredient in our successful outcomes.

The spirit of collaboration has also lead to the speech path­

ology team offering a vast array of professional development

programs for teachers and aides. We offer early years, middle

years and secondary training, as well as cued articulation.

School personnel are provided with training and ongoing

support to implement the oral language program in their

schools. MAKATON and other specific topics for individual

schools are also available on request.

Our work environment is changing and the need for work–

life-balance is an important concern for us as much as any

other setting. The “new” Victorian government Department

of Education and Early Childhood Development is in the pro­

cess of developing new structures and potentially expanding

our clinical caseload. The aim is for seamless service delivery

from birth to 24 years. Whatever the final outcomes, we see

endless opportunities for dynamic thinking on the horizon.

Correspondence to:

Erica Dixon

Speech Pathologist

Highlands Network, Grampians Region

Department of Education and Early Childhood Development

401 Macarthur Street

Ballarat, Victoria 3350

email:

dixon.erica.a@edumail.vic.gov.au

I

t seems life as a speech pathologist in the educational

setting is very different depending on the region in which

you are located. In Student Services of the Highlands

Network, Grampians Region, Department of Education and

Early Childhood Development in Victoria, we feel privileged

to be part of a highly dynamic and innovative multi­

disciplinary team of speech pathologists, psychologists,

social workers, and visiting teachers (visual impairment,

hearing impairment, physical disability, mental health and

autism spectrum). The unique drive for entrepreneurship

and innovation and co-location of the Student Services team,

as well as the service methods has attracted state-wide

interest.

In 2005, our service delivery model altered from a cluster

model to a centralised system, allowing Student Services

staff to be all based in the same office. Since this change we

have noticed very valuable professional dialogue both

between and within disciplines. This model also means that

we are able to have weekly Student Services meetings and

speech pathology team meetings which all contribute to team

cohesiveness. Our team is managed, supported and inspired

by a full time coordinator of student services.

Our service is based in Ballarat in Regional Victoria, but

we service a relatively large geographical area (from

Inverleigh to Yandoit, to Bacchus Marsh, to Waubra, to

Trentham). The distances involved mean that we have to

work “smarter” to provide support to our clients, families,

schools and school communities.

The types and amount of support that we are able to offer

our stakeholders (students, teachers, principals, school

communities and families) is vast and highly responsive.

Our high level of responsiveness is mostly attributable to our

“Consultation and Intake Phoneline”. This phone system

allows school personnel to contact a member of Student Ser­

vices from 8:30 a.m. until 4:30 p.m. each school day to discuss

options for support for students. Possible referrals to our

team are discussed and, where appropriate referral to other

more suitable community organisations or professionals is

recommended. Schools in our network have reported that

they are delighted with the unprecedented support that the

phoneline offers them. It has greatly enhanced our re­

lationships with schools and built our skills as individual

professionals. The process has also broadened our knowledge

of the greater services that our Student Services team pro­

vides. The intake system has allowed us to determine the

exact number of referrals that we receive. Each referral has

greater detail than before this process which allows for an

effective triage process. All of this means better service for

our clients.

Our caseload consists of children aged from grade prep

through to year 12. We predominantly work with children

with articulation, fluency and language difficulties. These

broad categories are made up of students with cleft palate,

hearing impairment, and childhood apraxia of speech, severe

language disorder, intellectual disability, autism and other

syndromes.

C

linical

I

nsights

Erica Dixon

Visit

www.speechpathologyaustralia.org.au