Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  161 / 464 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 161 / 464 Next Page
Page Background

147

THE CREATION OF NEW STATES AND

DE FACTO

REGIMES, AND THE CASE OF CRIMEA

peninsula. He also said: “I believe that we did the right thing and I have no regrets.”

63

In his announcement the Russian President admitted the annexation of Crimea,

which is considered a breach of international law.

Conclusion

It can be concluded that

de facto

regimes enjoy partial international legal

personality and are bound by both the law of treaties and customary international law.

The principle of effectivity prevails in the existence of

de facto

regimes. Even though

these regimes sometimes come into existence as a result of a breach of the norm of

international law, the states of the international community tolerate these

de facto

regimes for various reasons. The reasons can often be political or/and economical.

The international community is, in fact, for many reasons incapable of resolving the

questions of

de facto

regimes. One of the reasons for the toleration of these regimes is

the protection of the rights of individuals living in such territories. It can be said that

the international community prefers pragmatism in relation to such

de facto

regimes.

For this reason

de facto

regimes also enjoy some international law protection.

De facto

regimes, however, can survive thanks to other states or deployment of

foreign armed forces. They will never be recognized by the international community

or a large number of states, and therefore remain in isolation. Their existence depends

on the support of a small number of states or the superpowers which recognized

them.

64

For example, South Ossetia or Abkhazia, that were recognized by a small

number of states, namely Russia. In March 2015, for example, the Integration

Treaty between Russia and South Ossetia

65

was concluded. The agreement should

strengthen their cooperation in security, defense and international politics but also

in social and economic spheres. The treaty was criticized, among others, also by

the Czech Republic. These entities can exist for many years. As an example, the so

called Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, which came into existence as a result of

military action of Turkey in Cyprus in 1974.

It is in the interest of the international community to overcome

de facto

statehood.

As the situation in the Caucasus area demonstrates, they represent so called frozen

conflicts that pose a threat for peace in the region, where violence can erupt any time.

Military operations currently are taking place in Eastern Ukraine in relation to the

creation of so called the Donetsk and the Luhansk People’s Republics which were

proclaimed in 2014. Some authors classify them with the group of

de facto

states.

66

This may be premature, as it is not clear so far if they have become stable regimes, and

Russia so far has not supported their separation from Ukraine.

63

Ibid.

64

See: JANKUV, J. a kol.

Medzinárodné právo verejné.

1. časť. Plzeň 2015, s. 50 v tisku.

65

See: ČR odsoudila smlouvu Ruska s Jižní Osetijí.

Právo

z 20. března 2015.

66

Srov. JANKUV, J. a kol.

Medzinárodné právo verejné

. 1. časť. Plzeň 2015, s. 50 v tisku.