![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0210.png)
196
HARALD CHRISTIAN SCHEU
CYIL 6 ȍ2015Ȏ
concern social entitlements of inactive EU citizens. The concurrence of two sets of
rules in Regulation 883/2004 and Directive 2004/38 is, indeed, characterized by
a wide variety of vague terms and an unsolved relationship. No wonder that the
national courts turn in such a situation to the CJEU with hope and sometimes with
legitimate scepticism.
3. The social rights of economically inactive Union citizens
in the light of the Brey case
In the Brey case,
27
the CJEU had to deal with the clarification of the relationship
between Regulation 883/2004 and Directive 2004/38 and had the chance to, at
least partially, remedy the unclear legislation. The main subject of our analysis is the
interpretation of the term ‘social assistance’ in relation to potential claims of economically
inactive EU citizens.The Brey case concerned the payment of a compensatory supplement
intended to augment a retirement pension (Ausgleichszulage) under Austrian law. In
general, this social benefit is meant to serve the purpose of a minimum pension, which
as such is not regulated in Austria. In the case that the total income of a person who
is ordinarily resident in Austria and receives a pension there remains below a certain
reference amount (Richtsatz), the difference is offset by compensatory supplements.
In principle, such supplements may be seen as a social benefit for inactive citizens,
i.e. both Austrian nationals and migrating Union citizens.
3.1 A prelude to the case
After economically inactive EU citizens had started, in larger numbers, to claim
the compensatory supplement in Austria, the Austrian parliament, in December
2010, adopted legal provisions
28
which aim to restrict access of EU citizens to the
Austrian social assistance system. First, § 51 Section 1 of the Act on Establishment
and Residence was amended. In its original version the provision had provided
that EU citizens (resp. the citizens of the European Economic Area) have a right of
residence for more than three months, if they have sufficient resources in order to
ensure that during their stay they would not need social assistance. The amended
version reads as follows: “that during their stay they will not need social assistance or
compensatory supplement”. Secondly, § 292 Section 1 of the Law on Social Insurance
was amended,
29
so that the condition for granting the compensatory supplement
was no longer just a “habitual residence” but “lawful and habitual residence”. The
legality of residence was conditioned by the fact that the EU citizen would not need a
compensatory supplement to his pension. The explanatory report to both provisions
27
C-140/12.
28
Budgetbegleitgesetz 2011 (BGBl. I Nr. 111/2010).
29
Allgemeines Sozialversicherungsgesetz (BGBl. Nr. 189/1955/ BGBl. I Nr. 194/1999).