209
HUMAN RIGHTS BETWEEN STRASBOURG AND LUXEMBOURG …
HUMAN RIGHTS BETWEEN STRASBOURG
AND LUXEMBOURG – DISINTEGRATION
OF A MONIST VIEW OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION,
OR A NEW BEGINNING?
Monika Forejtová
Abstract
: The author of the article deals with the current situation in the field of
human rights protection in Europe, particularly taking into account the opinion of
the Court of Justice of the European Union, which has been formulated in the CJEU
opinion no. 2/2013. The Draft agreement on the accession of the European Union
to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental
Freedoms has been found incompatible with EU primary law. The author examines
the consequences of this situation and proposes the possible ways to resolve this
incompatibility between the CJEU and the European Court of Human Rights,
respectively EU and Council of Europe in the future.
Resumé:
Autorka se v článku zabývá současnou situací v oblasti ochrany lidských
práv Evropě, zejména s přihlédnutím ke stanovisku Soudního dvora Evropské unie,
které je formulované v posudku č. 2/2013. Tím byl Návrh dohody o přistoupení
EU k Evropské úmluvě o ochraně lidských práv shledán neslučitelným s primárním
právem EU. Autorka se zamýšlí nad důsledky této situace a naznačuje možnosti,
jak by mohl být vzniklý nesoulad mezi Soudním dvorem a Evropským soudem pro
lidská práva, resp. mezi EU a RE v budoucnu řešen.
Key words:
human rights, comparable legal protection, plural constitutionalism,
supremacy principle, Court of Justice of the European Union, European Court of
Human Rights, case law, monist human rights protection
About the Author:
JUDr. Monika Forejtová, Ph.D. in 1995 graduated from
the Faculty of Law of Charles University in Prague (Mgr. – 1995 Ph.D. – 2001
JUDr. – 2002). Currently, the vice-dean for international relations and head of
the Department of Constitutional and European Law Faculty of Law, University
of West Bohemia in Pilsen and externally collaborates with the Department of
European Law Faculty of Law of Charles University in Prague. Her teaching and
research activities are mainly devoted to particular issues of non-discrimination,
international law of protection of minorities, and European Union law. Since 2001
she has worked as an independent attorney in Prague.