Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  394 / 464 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 394 / 464 Next Page
Page Background

380

PAVEL ŠTURMA

CYIL 6 ȍ2015Ȏ

crimes against humanity”.

19

The text of this paragraph is inspired by Article 2 (2) of

the Convention against Torture (1984), as well as Article 1 (2) of the International

Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) or

Article 5 of the Inter-American Convention to Prevent and Punish Torture (1985).

20

2.4 Subsequent agreements and subsequent practice in relation

to the interpretation of treaties

With respect to this topic, the Commission had before it the third report of the

Special Rapporteur Georg Nolte,

21

which contained one draft conclusion relating

to constituent instruments of international organizations. Following the debate in

Plenary and the Drafting Committee, the Commission provisionally adopted draft

conclusion 11, together with commentaries thereto.

22

According to this conclusion

Articles 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties apply to a treaty

which is the constituent instrument of an international organization. Its paragraph 1

confirms that subsequent agreements and subsequent practice under Article 31, para. 3,

are, and other subsequent practice under Article 32 may be, means of interpretation for

such treaties. Paragraph 2 highlights that subsequent agreements and practice of State

parties may arise from their reactions to the practice of an international organization,

or they may be expressed in the practice of an organization in the application of its

constituent instrument.

23

Paragraph 3 of refers to another form of practice which may be relevant for the

interpretation of a constituent instrument of an international organization, i.e. the practice

of the organization as such. This practice only may contribute to the interpretation of that

instrument when applying Articles 31, para. 1, and 32 of the Vienna Convention.

24

2.5 Protection of the environment in relation to armed conflict

Concerning this topic, the Commission had before it the second report of the

Special Rapporteur, Ms. Marie Jacobsson.

25

The report examined existing rules of armed

conflict directly relevant to the protection of the environment in relation to armed

conflict. It contained five draft principles and three preambular paragraphs relating to

the scope and purpose of the draft principles as well as use of terms. Following the

debate in Plenary, the Commission decided to refer the draft preambular paragraphs

and the draft principles to the Drafting Committee, with the understanding that the

provision on “Use of terms” was referred for the purpose of facilitating discussions and

to be left pending by the Drafting Committee at this stage.

19

Ibid

., p. 22.

20

Ibid

., pp. 32-33.

21

See doc. A/CN.4/683 (2015).

22

See doc. A/CN.4/L.861 (2015).

23

See doc. A/CN.4/L.861 (2015), p. 7, § 15.

24

See doc. A/CN.4/L.861 (2015), p. 12, § 26.

25

See doc. A/CN.4/685 (2015).