![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0435.png)
421
THE CRIME OF AGGRESSION UNDER THE ROME STATUTE …
Carrie McDougall
The Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute of the International
Criminal Court
[Zločin agrese v Římském statutu Mezinárodního trestního soudu]
2013: Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 411 p., Cambridge Studies
in International and Comparative Law
The crime of aggression was added within the jurisdiction of the International
Criminal Court (hereinafter referred to as the “ICC”) during the Rome conference
already in 1998; however the exercise of the jurisdiction was postponed till the crime
and conditions for exercise of the jurisdiction would be defined.
1
This occurred in
2010 in Ugandan Kampala when the Review Conference adopted Resolution RC/
Res. 6, on the definition of the crime of aggression (hereinafter referred to as the
“Resolution”).
Due to the still relatively short time since adoption of the Resolution, there have
not been many books written on the subject yet. One example is the book that I
have decided to write a review of. Its author, Carrie McDougall, has been a member
of the Special Working Group on the Crime of Aggression as a representative of the
Australian government, which allowed her to gain a lot of interesting information
about the negotiations, and she provides this in her work.
The book was first published in 2015 as a hardback, this year as a paperback copy.
It is divided into 7 chapters, each dealing with a particular set of issues related to
crime. The first one introduces the topic and its historical evolution, while the main
focus lies within the negotiations between the Rome and Kampala conferences. The
second chapter discusses positive and negative arguments in favour of (or against)
criminalising aggression. The author reaches mainly positive answers to the answer of
whether aggression should be criminalised. Generally, I agree with her. The trouble
comes later.
Chapters 3 to 6 deal with the crime of aggression from different aspects. Unlike
the author of the book, I am not so optimistic as to the result of the negotiations; I
do not think that the compromise reached brings more positives than negatives to
criminalisation of aggression;, however, there is no doubt that Carrie McDougall has
presented an excellent analysis of the topic and has pointed out critical issues that
the ICC will need to deal with if jurisdiction over the crime of aggression ever will
be activated.
1
Article 5 (2) of the Rome Statute, 2187 UNTS 3, adopted on July 17, 1998, entered into force on
July 1, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the „Rome Statute“).