Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  38 / 189 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 38 / 189 Next Page
Page Background

Immingham East Terminal – Gasoline Overfill Protection

Safety Instrument System

P & I Design Ltd

DOCUMENT NO: SI277001_RPT

2 Reed Street, Thornaby, UK, TS17 7AF

ISSUE:

F

DATE: 31.10.14

Tel: + 44 (0)1642 617444

PAGE 17 OF 29

Fax: + 44 (0)1642 616447

www.pidesign.co.uk

7.2.2.3 Logic Solver Subsystem Hardware Fault Tolerance

BS EN 61511-1:2003 Section 11.4 requires a minimum hardware fault tolerance.

Table 6 of the standard is reproduced below:

SIL

Minimum hardware fault tolerance

(see 11.4.3 and 11.4.4)

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

Special requirements apply

BS EN 61511-1:2003 Section 11.4.3 states that the fault tolerance in the above table should

be increased by 1, unless the dominant failure mode is to the safe state or dangerous failures

are detected.

The Safe fail Fraction of the Relay is 95% thus the dominant failure mode is to the safe state.

Therefore, the fault tolerance has not been increased by 1

BS EN 61511-1:2003 Section 11.4.4 states that the fault tolerance in the above table can be

reduced by 1 if the hardware complies with the following:

The hardware of the device is selected on the basis of prior use

The device allows adjustment of process related parameters only. i.e. measuring

range, upscale and downscale failures.

The adjustment of the process related parameters are protected either by jumper or

password.

The function has a SIL requirement of less than 4.

In this application the above requirements are true and a reduction of 1 applies thus a single

device can be used.

Comparatively, BS IEC 61508-2:2010 Section 7.4.3 requires architectural constraints on

hardware safety integrity.

Table 2 of the standard is reproduced below: