Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  189 / 236 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 189 / 236 Next Page
Page Background

Endoscopic OCH resection

in the literature using open techniques.

19,20

Although gen-

eral consensus existed on multiple aspects of the workup

and management of extraconal lesions, several notable ar-

eas of variability existed with respect to intraconal lesions.

These included the laterality and number of hands in the

approach, the methods of medial rectus retraction, and the

need for reconstruction. The increased technical complexity

of addressing intraconal OCHs coupled with their higher

reported postoperative morbidity suggests that continued

research into the optimal management of this subclass of le-

sions is of significant priority. The limitations of this study

include the retrospective nature of the data collection as

well as the modest sample size that precludes any formal

statistical analysis.

Conclusion

Cavernous hemangiomas are among the most common

orbital tumors; however, only 23 cases could be gath-

ered from experienced centers for this international study.

This reflects, in part, the current lack of widespread col-

laboration between oculoplastic and rhinologic surgeons.

Management of intraconal OCHs exhibited the greatest

variability among institutions, suggesting that additional

studies are needed to further optimize the approach to le-

sions in the intraconal space. As a field, we should con-

tinue to work to gain a greater familiarity with endoscopic

surgery of the orbit, create evidence-based protocols for en-

doscopic management of orbital pathology, and cultivate

the development of collaborative “orbital teams.”

References

1. Kennedy DW, Goodstein ML, Miller NR, Zinre-

ich SJ. Endoscopic transnasal orbital decompres-

sion.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

. 1990;116:

275–282.

2. Kountakis SE, Maillard AAJ, Urso R, Stiernberg CM.

Endoscopic approach to traumatic visual loss.

Oto-

laryngol Head Neck Surg

. 1997;116:652–655.

3. Mir-Salim PA, Berghaus A. Endonasal, microsurgi-

cal approach to the retrobulbar region exemplified

by intraconal hemangioma.

HNO

. 1999;47:192–195.

German

4. Herman P, Lot G, Silhouette B, et al. Transnasal en-

doscopic removal of an orbital cavernoma.

Ann Otol

Rhinol Laryngol

. 1999;108:147–150.

5. Castelnuovo P, Dallan I, Locatelli D, et al. Endoscopic

transnasal intraorbital surgery: our experience with 16

cases.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol

. 2012;269:1929–

1935.

6. McKinney KA, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, et al.

Seeing the light: endoscopic endonasal intraconal or-

bital tumor surgery.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

.

2010;143:699–701.

7. Stamm A, Nogueira JF. Orbital cavernous heman-

gioma: transnasal endoscopic management.

Otolaryn-

gol Head Neck Surg

. 2009;141:794–795.

8. Chhabra N, Wu AW, Fay A, Metson R. Endoscopic

resection of orbital hemangiomas.

Int Forum Allergy

Rhinol

. 2014;4:251–255.

9. Bleier BS, Lefebvre DR, Freitag SK. Endoscopic orbital

floor decompression with preservation of the infero-

medial strut.

Int Forum Allergy Rhinol

. 2014;4:82–

84.

10. Muscatello L, Seccia V, Caniglia M, Sellari-

Franceschini S, Lenzi R. Transnasal endoscopic

surgery for selected orbital cavernous heman-

giomas: our preliminary experience.

Head Neck

.

2013;35:E218–E220.

11. Folbe A, Herzallah I, Duvvuri U, et al. Endoscopic

endonasal resection of esthesioneuroblastoma: a mul-

ticenter study.

Am J Rhinol Allergy

. 2009;23:91–94.

12. McNab AA, Selva D, Hardy TG, O’Donnell B. The

anatomical location and laterality of orbital cavernous

haemangiomas.

Orbit

. 2014;33:359–362.

13. Dallan I, Locatelli D, Turri-Zanoni M, et al. Transor-

bital endoscopic assisted resection of a superior or-

bital fissure cavernous haemangioma: a technical case

report.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol

. (in press). Epub

2015 Feb 13. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3556-2.

14. Rootman DB, Heran MK, Rootman J, White

VA, Luemsamran P, Yucel YH. Cavernous venous

malformations of the orbit (so-called cavernous hae-

mangioma): a comprehensive evaluation of their clin-

ical, imaging and histologic nature.

Br J Ophthalmol

.

2014;98:880–888.

15. Kingdom TT, Delgaudio JM. Endoscopic approach to

lesions of the sphenoid sinus, orbital apex, and clivus.

Am J Otolaryngol

. 2003;24:317–322.

16. Bleier BS, Healy DY Jr, Chhabra N, Freitag S. Com-

partmental endoscopic surgical anatomy of the medial

intraconal orbital space.

Int Forum Allergy Rhinol

.

2014;4:587–591.

17. Paluzzi A, Gardner PA, Fernandez-Miranda JC, et al.

“Round-the-clock” surgical access to the orbit.

J Neu-

rol Surg B Skull Base

. 2015;76:12–24.

18. Schietroma JJ, Tenzel RR. The effects of cautery

on the optic nerve.

Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg

.

1990;6:102–107.

19. Scheuerle AF, Steiner HH, Kolling G, Kunze S,

Aschoff A. Treatment and long-term outcome of pa-

tients with orbital cavernomas.

Am J Ophthalmol

.

2004;138:237–244.

20. Boari N, Gagliardi F, Castellazzi P, Mortini P. Sur-

gical treatment of orbital cavernomas: clinical and

functional outcome in a series of 20 patients.

Acta

Neurochir (Wien)

. 2011;153:491–498.

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology, Vol. 6, No. 2, February 2016

167