Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  31 / 236 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 31 / 236 Next Page
Page Background

clinicians (and ultimately patients) with a realistic view-

point on contemporary surgical outcomes and also recom-

mend a minimum dataset for reporting of outcomes.

METHODS

A structured search of the Cochrane Collaboration database,

U.S National Institutes of Health database (ClinicalTrials), and

U.S National Library of Medicine (PubMed) was undertaken

using a combination of medical subject-heading (MeSH) terms:

nose, turbinate, surgery, atrophic rhinitis, and empty nose syn-

drome. The review period was restricted from January 1, 2000, to

June 30, 2014, and limited to the English language. The

abstracts were appraised for relevance, and full-text articles were

obtained as appropriate. The bibliography of each article was

reviewed to identify any other potentially relevant study. The

full-text version was then reviewed for patient demographics,

surgical intervention, complications, and outcome. If single units

had reported on more than one case series with overlapping

review periods, the earlier study was excluded unless it contained

more comprehensive data for analysis than the latter report.

Finally, the studies were assessed according to criteria defined by

the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (Oxford, UK).

For studies that utilized similar clinical outcome tools

such as the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT), data were col-

lated according to individual patients and domain scores.

Browne et al.

11

described four distinct subdomains within the

SNOT-20: 1) rhinologic symptoms, 2) ear and facial symptoms,

3) sleep function, and 4) psychological issues. Houser proposed

an additional five ENS-specific questions to aid with the assess-

ment of ENS patients

7

(Table I).

Statistical analysis was performed using SigmaPlot ver-

sion 12 (Systat Software, Inc., CA). A normality test (Shapiro-

Wilk) was undertaken; as appropriate, the Student

t

test or

Mann–Whitney U test was used to assess the difference

between pre- and postsurgery SNOT scores. A

P

value of 0.05

was deemed to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

Literature Search

Fourteen studies were identified from the PubMed

literature search. Five were excluded due to insufficient

outcome data, including one that was exclusively man-

aged medically.

12–16

The remaining nine were potentially

suitable for review.

17–25

One other clinical trial was iden-

tified from the U.S National Institutes of Health elec-

tronic database, but this trial was terminated when the

lead investigator left the sponsoring institution. Of the

nine potentially suitable studies, one was excluded

because a more recent report from the same institution

yielded more data.

21

The remaining eight studies were

eligible for inclusion (Fig. 1). Seven studies were graded

as level 4 evidence base, whereas one study randomized

patients to either the Silastic (Dow Corning, Midland,

MI) or AlloDerm (LifeCell Corporation, NJ) implant group

(level 2b).

22

The overall grade of recommendation was C.

Patient Demographics

A total of 128 patients (84 males) were collated

from the eight studies, with an age range of 18 to 64

years (Table II). A diagnosis of ENS in all cases was

achieved from clinical history and examination. Two

studies undertook preoperative rhinomanometry and/or

acoustic rhinometry, although the measurements did not

influence a diagnosis or indication for ENS surgery.

22,25

The use of the cotton wool test to select suitable surgical

TABLE I.

The Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-25 for the Assessment of Empty

Nose Syndrome.

6,7

1

Need to blow nose

2

Sneezing

3

Runny nose

4

Cough

5

Postnasal discharge

6

Thick nasal discharge

7

Ear fullness

8

Dizziness

9

Ear pain

10

Facial pain/pressure

11

Difficulty falling asleep

12

Waking up at night

13

Lack of good night’s sleep

14

Waking up tired

15

Fatigue

16

Reduced productivity

17

Reduced concentration

18

Frustration/restlessness/irritability

19

Sadness

20

Embarrassment

ENS-specific symptoms

21

Dryness

22

Difficulty with nasal breathing

23

Suffocation

24

Nose is too open

25

Nasal crusting

Each question is evaluated on a Likert scale of 0 to 5, with 5 being

most severe.

ENS

5

empty nose syndrome.

Fig. 1. Flow chart of literature search strategy.

MeSH

5

medical subject heading.

Laryngoscope 125: July 2015

Leong: Surgical Interventions for Empty Nose Syndrome

9