Previous Page  129 / 161 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 129 / 161 Next Page
Page Background

Conformational Ensembles from Experimental Data

and Computer Simulations

Poster Abstracts

125 

88-POS

Board 8

Correlating Ion Occupation and Voltage-Dependent Selectivity Filter Gating Obtained

from Functional Data of a K

+

Channel

Oliver Rauh

1

, Ulf-Peter Hansen

2

, Gerhard Thiel

1

,

Indra Schroeder

1

.

1

Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany,

2

Christian-Albrechts-University of

Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

The conformational transition between conducting and non-conducting states (“gating”) in the

selectivity filter of potassium channels is influenced by the occupation of the ion binding sites

inside the filter. This has been shown by numerous functional, structural and computational

studies (e.g.1–3). However, which of the structural findings applies to which

electrophysiological observation is not always clear. Here, we show that classical kinetic

modelling – when based on current structural knowledge - is able to provide a bridge between

structural/computational data and electrophysiology.

The viral K

+

channel Kcv

NTS

served a model system(4). It closely resembles the pore domain of

more complex K

+

channels in structure and function and shows a fast, strongly voltage-

dependent gating process at negative membrane potentials. Channels were expressed

in vitro

and

reconstituted into planar lipid bilayers.Because the voltage-dependent gating process is faster

than the temporal resolution of bilayer experiments, extended beta distribution analysis(5) was

employed to determine the open channel current and the rate constants of gating.

From current structural knowledge, a kinetic model for the ion flux was derived and fitted to the

single-channel IV curves. Specific states within the conduction cycle could be correlated with the

voltage-dependent rate of channel closing of Kcv

NTS

.

References:

(1) Zhou, Y. et al.. Nature 2001, 414 (6859), 43–48.

(2) Bernèche, S.; Roux, B. Structure 2005, 13 (4), 591–600.

(3) Schewe, M. et al.. Cell 2016, 164 (5), 937–949.

(4) Rauh, O. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, epub ahead of print.

(5) Schroeder, I. Channels 2015, 9 (5), 262–280.