Previous Page  23 / 114 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 23 / 114 Next Page
Page Background

JUNE, 1913]

the Gazette of the Incorporated Law Society of Ireland.

be the same for two and three-quarters per

cent, stock as for three per cent, stock, and

the proviso to that paragraph shall accord–

ingly be amended so as to read as follows :

Provided that no issue of stock shall be

made within fifteen days of the next succeed–

ing dividend day.

(Signed),

JOHN W. GULLAND.

WEDGWOOD BENN.

Recent Decisions affecting Solicitors.

(Noles of decisions, whether in reported or

unreported cases, of -interest to Solicitors, are

invited from Members.)

COUNTY COURT.

(Before His Honor Judge Orr, K.C.)

MlTCHELL AND TAGGART

V.

BALLYMONEY

RURAL DISTRICT COUNCIL.

April 18, 1913.

Labourers (Ireland) Acts and

Orders—Costs of furnishing title.

THIS was a Civil Bill proceeding to recover

two guineas costs for furnishing title to land

taken for the purposes of the Labourers Acts.

Mr. Thomas Taggart, Solicitor, appeared

for the Plaintiffs ;

Mr. J. B. Hamilton,

Solicitor (of Messrs. Greer and Hamilton),

appeared for defendants ;

and Mr. W. E.

Wiley (instructed by Messrs. T. T. Mecredy

and Son), appeared for the Local Government

Board.

In delivering judgment His Honor said :

This is an action brought to recover the sum

of two guineas for the cost of making title to

a plot of ground, part of

the plaintiff,

Mitchell's, farm, taken by the defendants for

the purpose of erecting thereon a labourer's

cottage, under the Labourers (Ireland) Acts,

1883-1906.

The case was heard at the last Ballymoney

Hilary Sessions, when Mr. Wiley appeared

and, by leave of the Court and with the

consent of the parties to the suit, argued the

case on behalf of the Local Government

Board, and as the point in dispute is of

frequent occurrence, and some important

principles of law are involved, I adjourned

the case to these present Sessions for judg–

ment, in order that I might carefully examine

and consider the various sections, orders and

authorities which were cited.

As to the facts of the case, there is no

dispute.

It appears

that

the Council,

requiring the plot in question for the purposes

of the " Ballymoney Labourers Scheme H,"

served

the necessary notices upon

the

plaintiff Mitchell, and the price was fixed,

I presume by arbitration, at £56 10s. Od. for

the value of Mr. Mitchell's interest in the

land, and £3 10s. Od.

for consequential

damage;

and

then Messrs. Greer

and

Hamilton, Solicitors for the Council, applied

to Dr. Taggart, Solicitor, for Mr. Mitchell

for a statement of his title by a letter dated

1st March, 1911, to which I shall hereafter

more particularly refer. An abstract of title

was duly furnished, by which it appeared

that John Mitchell,

father of Edmund

Mitchell, the plaintiff and now tenant in

occupation, was absolutely entitled to the

farm in 1870 ;

that by deed dated 3rd

October, 1898, John Mitchell assigned his

farm

to his son, Edmund Mitchell,

the

plaintiff,

and

his

daughter,

Elizabeth

Mitchell,

as

tenants

in

common;

that

Elizabeth Mitchell was dead, having pre–

viously made her Will, which had not been

proved, whereby she bequeathed her un–

divided share to her brother, the plaintiff,

for his life, and after his death to her nephew,

Edward Mitchell,

absolutely.

Edmund

Mitchell, the plaintiff and vendor, was there–

fore absolutely entitled to one undivided

moiety only, the other undivided moiety

being in settlement. Certain requisitions on

title were furnished and were complied with,

and then a receipt for the purchase money

and interest was signed by Edmund Mitchell

and Edward Mitchell, which had the effect,

under the provisions of the Labourers Acts,

of vesting the land in the Council for all the

estate and interest of Edmund Mitchell and

Edward Mitchell. Dr. Taggart then sent in

his Bill of Costs of making out title, amounting

to

two guineas in my opinion a most

moderate one which the Council declined to

pay, on the ground that, by .the Rules of the

Local Government Board, the sum of 10/6

only was payable for deducing title in a case

like the present, where the vendor, being a

tenant from year to year in occupation, had

had a fair rent fixed ;

and accordingly this

action was brought.

By Sec. 31 of the

Labourers (Ireland) Act, 1906, the Local

Government Board are empowered to make