Previous Page  156 / 482 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 156 / 482 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

APRIL 1989

Type of

Case

District

Court

Circuit

Court

High

Court

Supreme

Court

Total

Family Law

873 (854)* 289 (349)

66 (65)

3 (3)

1,231 (1,271)

Other

29 (10)

35 (31)

20 (18)

2 (1)

86

(60)

1,317 (1,331)

7Previous year's figures in brackets).

Law Centres are in constant

contact with private practitioners.

The more the private profession

understands the strengths and

limitations of the service, the more

effectively it is likely to operate.

One hopes that this article will have

contributed to this understanding.

It is worth making the point, also,

that in periods which see services

temporarily restricted, arrange-

ments are made whereby whjt are

described as "emergency" cases

continue to be taken on. The latter

include, for example, cases of

severe matrimonial violence or

abuse of children, or cases where

there is a threat to remove a child

from the jurisdiction - assuming,

in all cases, that the services of a

solicitor are actually necessary. The

Centres also continue to handle

existing clients during these

periods - temporary restrictions,

in other words, apply to new

clients.

Referral of Case by Private

Practitioners.

With regard to the referral of cases

to the Legal Aid service by prac-

itioners, it would be of great benefit

if the following arrangements were

applied:-

(a ) Practitioners should try to avoid

referring cases at the last

minute, e.g. where proceedings

are already set to take place

within a few weeks (some-

times within days) of the

referral.

(b) The Law Centre should be

contacted, in the first instance,

by 'phone, to find out whether

they can take on the case (for

example, is it the type of case

that is covered by the

Scheme?) and how soon they

can give the applicant an

appointment.

( c ) A properly organised file,

ideally with a brief summary of

the facts, should be forwarded

to the centre. The solicitor

referring the case - especially

if it is a complicated case

which has been with his firm

for some time - should make

himself available to the Law

Centre solicitor to discuss

points of difficulty.

Obviously the above is in the

nature of a "wish list"; it will not

be possibly, in all cases, to meet all

of these desiderata. The Board,

naturally, is conscious that when

the "traffic" if flowing the other

way (i.e. when Law Centre clients

are referred to private practitoners),

it is equally important that properly

organised files etc. be presented to

the firm concerned.

Concluding Comments

The legal aid service is part of the

justice system. Its primary aim is to

provide persons of limited means

with effective access to justice.

Because of the severe budgetary

situation experienced in recent

years, the service is not by any

means as extensive as would be

warranted by reference to the size

of the problem it attempts to

address.

This article will have demon-

trated that there are complexities

associated with the provision of a

civil legal aid service, most of them

having to do with the maintenance

of proper controls. The same is true

of corresponding services in other

jurisdictions - the Legal Aid

Schemes in neighbouring juris-

dictions are, in many ways, more

complex in their operation than

ours.

It goes without saying that

complexity is never a virtue. No

doubt, one of the aims of any

review which will take place in the

context of introducing a Statutory

measure will be to simplify the

Scheme. The degree to which

simplicity can be achieved, how-

ever, is limited. One of the main

reasons for this is that civil legal aid

is not just a matter of providing

persons of limited means with

access to justice - though, this is

its principal aim - it also means

that a very powerful weapon is put

in the hands of individuals, who

happen to qualify, whereby they

can, with the backing of State

resources, take others, who do not

qualify, literally to any Court in the

land. The potential for abuse, in

that situation, is clear and the need

for effective control mechanisms is

equally clear.

In their day-to-day operations,

Relevant Addresses etc.

Law Centres:

45 Lower Gardiner Street,

Dublin 1. (01-787295)

Aston House, Aston Place,

Dublin 2. (01-712177)

9, Lower Ormond Quay, Dublin

1. (01-724133)

517 Main Street, Tallaght,

Dublin 24. (01-511519)

24 North Mall, Cork.

(021-300365)

96 South Mall, Cork.

(021-275998)

5 Mary Street, Galway.

(091-61650)

Lower Mallow Street, Limerick.

(061-314599)

5 Catherine Street, Waterford.

(051-55814)

1 Teeling Street, Sligo.

(071-61670)

6 High Street, Tralee, Co. Kerry.

(066-26900)

Northgate Street, Athlone, Co.

Westmeath. (0902-74694)

Head Office

47 Upper Mount Street, Dublin

2. (01-615811)

Association of Criminal Lawyers

The Association of Criminal Law-

yers is in the process of preparing a

comprehensive report on the short-

comings in the present system of

legal aid payments and proposals

will be submitted to the Law Society

and the Department of Justice. Any

members of the Association who

wish to make submissions are

invited to do so in writing within the

next three weeks to Padraig Ferry,

Solicitor, 4 Chancery Place, Dublin

7. Please note that all membership

subscriptions for 1989 are now due.

A cheque for £15 can be sent to

Elizabeth Ferris, Solicitor, Arran

Chambers, 6 Arran Quay, Dublin 7.

142