Previous Page  277 / 482 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 277 / 482 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

AUGUST 1989

In

this

Issue

Viewpoint

255

No Need to Notify?

Block Exemption Agreements

under Article 85 of the

Treaty of Rome

257

From the President 2 65

The European Economic

Interest Groupings

266

Practice Notes 269 Why you should join Solicitors Financial and Property Services. 271

Article 5.1 of

Brussels Convention

273

Recognition of Higher Education Qualifications (Diplomas) 279 Younger Members News 281

Interview with Thomas

O'Higgins

283

Annual General Meeting

of SYS

287

Correspondence 288

Braille Irish Law

book launched

289

Book Reviews 2 90 Professional Information 293

Cover Photo:

(left to right) John Fish,

member of the Law Society's EC (1992)

and International Affairs Committee,

Margaret Byrne, Librarian, and Ken

Murphy, Chairman of the Committee.

Executive Editor:

Mary Gaynor

Committee:

Geraldine Clarke, Chairman

Eamonn G. Hall, Vice-Chairman

John F. Buckley

Gary Byrne

Patrick McMahon

Charles R. M. Meredith

Daire Murphy

John Schutte

Advertising:

Seán Ó hOisín. Telephone: 305236

307860

Printing:

Turner's Printing Co. Ltd., Longford.

The views expressed in this publication,

save where otherwise indicated, are the

views of the contributors and not

necessarily the views of the Council of

the Society.

The appearance of an advertisement in

this publication does not necessarily

indicate approval by the Society for the

product or service advertised.

Published at Blackhall Place, Dublin 7.

Tel.: 710711.

Telex: 31219. .. Fax: 710704.

GAZETT

Viewpoint

"The Law Society should consider

opening an office in Brussels to

help keep the Solicitors' profession

fully advised about 1992 legal

developments". So said Peter

Sutherland in Blackhall Place at the

recent launch of 'EURLEGAL' - the

Solicitors Profession's response to

1992.

In the course of a characteristi-

cally e l oquen t, incisive and

thought-provoking address the

former European Commissioner

spoke of the enormous opportunity

which the legal profession could

lose to other advisers if it is not as

geared up as they are to provide up-

to-date information and analysis of

the changes which 1992 is bringing

to business, both in Ireland and

throughout Europe.

He once again made the point,

one that is usually missed about

1992, that it is a legal programme.

Law lies at the very heart of the

European Community. The Com-

munity itself was created by law, it

has created its own system of law

and all of its activities operate

through this legal system. Although

the objectives of the 1992 pro-

gramme are political and economic,

the programme itself is comprised

entirely of law - literally hundreds

of new laws all of which will have

effect in Ireland.

All business activity is pro-

foundly effected by the legal frame-

work in which it is conducted.

What is or is not legally possible for

a company and its competitors is

fundamental to every commercial

decision. It is important for every

business to know the law from two

points of view. The first is compli-

ance and the second is analysis

which allows response to the

opportunities which the law provides.

Conc l ud i ng his speech he

expressed himself to be very

pleased wi th the advent of the

JUSTIS on-line European Com-

munity Law data base. Through this

the basic information to deal wi th

any client query is only a phone call

INCORPORATE D

LAWSOCIETY

OF IRELAND

Vol.83 No.8 August 198

away. This system will only be of

value, however, if solicitors identify

the occasions when it can be

availed of and then actually use it.

In practical terms, how relevant will

1992 be for solicitors in Ireland? It

is impossible to respond to such a

question without speculating on

the future of the legal profession in

Europe generally.

At the European Summit meeting

in Madrid on 26th and 27th June

1989 the Delors Committee report

on Economic and Monetary Union

domi na t ed the agenda. The

metaphor of a train leaving a

station was much used to describe

the result. That

all

the passengers

were aboard is, for the moment at

least, more significant than the

now notorious lack of unanimous

agreement among them as to either

the length, or even the ultimate

destination, of the journey. To most

observers, however, it appears that

a powerful process has com-

menced which will lead to more

and more important decisions,

effecting all our lives, being taken

at European rather than national level.

As Peter Sutherland has pointed

out, the European Community

operates exclusively through mak-

ing and enforcing laws. All laws

require interpretation and applica-

tion on the basis of legal principles,

existing statutes and precedent

cases. Lawyers invariably do well in

a federal system and from this one

might conclude that the future for

the legal profession in Europe must

be rosy. The more law that is

created the more work there will be

for lawyers.

That is far too simplistic an

analysis, however. The whole

thrust of 1992 and of Community

orientation generally is towards free

and open competition. Whether

regulating or deregulating (and

often it is difficult to distinguish the

two) the Community does not look

at professions but at activities. If

the legal profession competes well

(Contd. on p.257)

255