Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  14 / 264 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 14 / 264 Next Page
Page Background

III.

Hearing Loss

A.

Sensorineural hearing loss

Briggs R, Van Hasselt A, Luntz M, et al. Clinical performance of a new magnetic bone

conduction hearing implant system: results from a prospective, multicenter, clinical

investigation.

Otol Neurotol

. 2015; 36(5):834-841. EBM level 2b.................................118-125

Summary

: Twenty-seven patients with mixed, conductive, and single-sided hearing loss who

received the Baha Attract System were studied for 9 months. Patient benefit, soft-tissue status,

device retention, and safety were monitored. Results demonstrated significant improvement in

audibility and speech understanding in noise and quiet when compared to preoperative unaided

hearing.

Roland JT Jr, Gantz BJ, Waltzman SB, et al. United States multicenter clinical trial of the

cochlear nucleus hybrid implant system.

Laryngoscope

. 2016; 126(1):175-181. EBM

level 2b................................................................................................................................126-132

Summary

: This article discusses U.S. trials for the Cochlear Nucleus Hybrid L24 implant at ten

investigational sites. The study included 50 patients with low-frequency hearing intact. Mean

improvements in consonant-nucleus-consonant and AzBio were seen in nearly all patients.

Hearing preservation rate (as defined as any measurable hearing) at 6 months was 66%.

B.

Conductive and mixed hearing loss

Marino R, Lampacher P, Dittrich G, et al. Does coupling and positioning in vibroplasty matter?

A prospective cohort study.

Otol Neurotol

. 2015; 36(7):1223-1230. EBM

level 2..................................................................................................................................133-140

Summary

: This is a prospective cohort study evaluating the audiological outcomes in patients

with conductive/mixed hearing loss who underwent vibroplasty surgery using three different

coupling techniques (direct to round window [RW], soft-tissue RW coupling, and stapes/incus

coupling). Patients with soft tissue interposed between the floating mass transducer and RW

showed the poorest coupling efficiency. Direct RW coupling was significantly better than with

soft-tissue RW coupling. Vibroplasty directly to the ossicular chain provided the best coupling

efficiency outcomes.

Wegner I, van Waes AMA, Bittermann AJ, et al. A systematic review of the diagnostic value

of CT imaging in diagnosing otosclerosis.

Otol Neurotol

. 2016; 37(1):9-15. EBM

level 3..................................................................................................................................141-147

Summary

: This article is a systematic review of the utility of CT in the diagnosis of otosclerosis

in patients with conductive hearing loss. In patients with a strong clinical suspicion of

otosclerosis, the positive and negative predictive value of CT is relatively high. In patients with

a low suspicion for otosclerosis, positive and negative predictive values of CT were much

lower. CT imaging for conductive hearing loss is only recommended for suspected pathology

other than otosclerosis when preparing for middle ear surgery.