Background Image
Previous Page  259 / 280 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 259 / 280 Next Page
Page Background

MACIS score

>

4.0 was associated with aggressive

PTC.

22

We did not find a difference in BRAF V600E

mutations between patients with a MACIS score

<

4,

and with scores of 4 or greater (60% vs. 25%,

P

5

.56).

Overall MACIS score showed a trend toward negative

association with the BRAF V600E mutation (

P

5

.087).

In adults, BRAF V600E has been shown to be a useful

prognostic indicator when added to MACIS

23

; however,

another study

24

failed to show a statistical association

between a MACIS score of

>

6 (which is commonly used

as a cutoff for aggressive disease in adults) and the pres-

ence of the BRAF mutation. No studies previous per-

formed in children with the BRAF V600E mutation have

reviewed association with MACIS score.

Children typically present with higher rates of

regional metastases (57% in one study

2

) than adults (13%

in one study

25

). Two other studies in children examined the

presence of lymphatic metastases

14

and tumor size, lymph

node invasion, distant metastases, and extrathyroidal

extension,

11

and did not find any significant association

with BRAF mutation status (Table III). Two recent meta-

analyses in adults found a significant association of BRAF

V600E with lymphatic metastases,

8

tumor size

>

1 cm,

8

and extrathyroidal extension.

7,8

One study did not examine

association with lymphovascular invasion,

7

whereas one

did not demonstrate an association of lymphovascular inva-

sion with BRAF V600E.

8

Our findings are also in agree-

ment with the existing pediatric literature, which found no

association of the BRAF V600E mutation with lymphatic or

distant metastases

11,14

or extrathyroidal extension.

11

We acknowledge the limitations of this study in that it

is a retrospective review with a small sample size. The

study is insufficiently powered to detect a statistically sig-

nificant association between the BRAF mutation and

aggressive disease characteristics, if one truly exists. Addi-

tionally, certain variables such as tumor size, lymphovascu-

lar invasion, and extrathyroidal or extracapsular extension

were inconsistently reported in our pathology reports.

Finally, patient follow-up information was not always avail-

able, making association with recurrence unclear.

CONCLUSION

The BRAF V600E mutation may be more prevalent

than previously thought in pediatric patients with PTC,

but it is not associated with aggressive disease character-

istics. This is in contrast to the findings in the adult popu-

lation, where a BRAF gene mutation may be an indication

for more aggressive surgical treatment. We cannot sup-

port that conclusion in the pediatric population.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Shalene Ashby, MS, CHES, for

assistance with statistical analysis.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Josefson J, Zimmerman D. Thyroid nodules and cancers in children.

Pediatr Endocrinol Rev

2008;6:14–23.

2. Chaukar DA, Rangarajan V, Nair N, et al. Pediatric thyroid cancer.

J Surg

Oncol

2005;92:130–133.

3. Garnett MJ, Marais R. Guilty as charged: B-RAF is a human oncogene.

Cancer Cell

2004;6:313– 319.

4. Wan PT, Garnett MJ, Roe SM, et al. Mechanism of activation of the RAF-

ERK signaling pathway by onco-genic mutations of B-RAF.

Cell

2004;

116:855–867.

5. Davies H, Bignell GR, Cox C, et al. Mutations of the

BRAF

gene in human

cancer.

Nature

2002;417:949–954.

6. Rowe LR, Bentz BG, Bentz JS. Detection of BRAF V600E activating muta-

tion in papillary thyroid carcinoma using PCR with allele-specific fluo-

rescent probe melting curve analysis.

J Clin Pathol

2007;60:1211–1215.

7. Tufano RP, Teixeira GV, Bishop J, Carson KA, Xing M. BRAF mutation in

papillary thyroid cancer and its value in tailoring initial treatment: a

systematic review and meta-analysis.

Medicine (Baltimore)

2012;91:274–

286.

8. Lee C, Lee KC, Schneider EB, Zeiger MA. BRAF V600E mutation and its

association with clinicopathological features of papillary thyroid cancer:

a meta-analysis.

J Clin Endocrinol Metab

2012;97:4559–4570.

9. Kimura ET, Nikiforova MN, Zhu Z, et al. High prevalence of BRAF muta-

tions in thyroid cancer: genetic evidence for constitutive activation of

the ret/ptc-ras-BRAF signaling pathway in papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Cancer Res

2003;63:1454–1457.

10. Nikiforova MN, Ciampi R, Salvatore G, et al. Low prevalence of BRAF

mutations in radiation-induced thyroid tumors in contrast to sporadic

papillary carcinomas.

Cancer Lett

2004;209:1–6.

11. Kumagai A, Namba H, Saenko VA, et al. Low frequency of BRAFT1796A

mutations in childhood thyroid carcinomas.

J Clin Endocrinol Metab

2004;89:4280–4284.

12. Penko K, Livezey J, Fenton C, et al. BRAF mutations are uncommon in

papillary thyroid cancer of young patients.

Thyroid

2005;15:320–325.

13. Rosenbaum E, Hosler G, Zahurak M, Cohen Y, Sidransky D, Westra WH.

Mutational activation of BRAF is not a major event in sporadic child-

hood papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Mod Pathol

2005;18:898–902.

14. Sassolas G, Hafdi-Nejjari Z, Ferraro A, et al. Oncogenic alterations in pap-

illary thyroid cancers of young patients.

Thyroid

2012;22:17–26.

15. Hay ID, Bergstralth EJ, Goellner JR, Ebersold JR, Grant CS. Predicting

outcome in papillary thyroid carcinoma: development of a reliable prog-

nostic scoring system in a cohort of 1779 patients surgically treated at

one institution during 1940 through 1989.

Surgery

1993;114:1050–1057.

16. Farrand K, Jovanovic L, Delahunt B, et al. Loss of heterozygosity studies

revisited: prior quantification of the amplifiable DNA content of archival

samples improves efficiency and reliability.

J Mol Diagn

2002;4:150–

158.

17. Vaughn CP, Zobell SD, Furtado LV, Baker CL, Samowitz WS. Frequency of

KRAS, BRAF, and NRAS mutations in colorectal cancer.

Genes Chromo-

somes Cancer

2011;50:307–312.

18. Gouveia C, Can NT, Bostrom A, Grenert JP, van Zante A, Orloff LA. Lack

of association of BRAF mutation with negative prognostic indicators in

papillary thyroid carcinoma: the University of California, San Francisco,

experience.

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

2013;139:1164–1170.

19. Xing M, Haugen BR, Schlumberger M. Progress in molecular-based man-

agement of differentiated thyroid cancer.

Lancet

2013;381:1058–1069.

20. Alexander EK, Kennedy GC, Baloch ZW, et al. Preoperative diagnosis of

benign thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology.

N Engl J Med

2012;367:705–715.

21. Nikiforov YE, Yip L, Nikiforova MN. New strategies in diagnosing cancer

in thyroid nodules: Impact of molecular markers.

Clin Cancer Res

2013;

19:2283–2288.

22. Powers PA, Dinauer CA, Tuttle RM, Francis GL. The MACIS score pre-

dicts the clinical course of papillary thyroid carcinoma in children and

adolescents.

J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab

2004;17:339–343.

23. Prescott JD, Sadow PM, Hodin RA, et al. BRAFV600E status adds incre-

mental value to current risk classification systems in predicting papil-

lary thyroid carcinoma recurrence.

Surgery

2012;152:984–990.

24. Nam JK, Jung CK, Song BJ, et al. Is the BRAF(V600E) mutation useful

as a predictor of preoperative risk in papillary thyroid cancer?

Am J

Surg

2012;203:436–441.

25. Lin JD, Liou MJ, Chao TC, Weng HF, Ho YS. Prognostic variables of pap-

illary and follicular thyroid carcinoma patients with lymph node metas-

tases and without distant metastases.

Endocr Relat Cancer

1999;6:109–

115.

Laryngoscope 124: September 2014

Givens

et

al.: BRAF

V600E

and

Pediatric

Thyroid Carcinoma

237