Background Image
Previous Page  72 / 280 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 72 / 280 Next Page
Page Background

C

URRENT

O

PINION

Management of sleep apnea in the cleft population

Harlan R. Muntz

Purpose of review

Obstructive sleep apnea is prevalent in children with facial clefts. As there are increasing concerns that

sleep disordered breathing and obstructive sleep apnea may lead to cognitive difficulties, it is imperative

that the otolaryngologist and cleft surgeon be aware of the concerns for sleep disorders and implement

appropriate interventions for the management.

Recent findings

Micrognathia associated with Robin Sequence has long been understood to have significant potential for

sleep apnea. Positioning, nasopharyngeal airway, tongue–lip adhesion and mandibular distraction have

been used to improve the breathing in this set of children. Screened by symptoms, a large proportion of

children with clefts will have a positive sleep study. Syndromic children seem to be more prone to this,

even though nonsyndromic children are also at risk. Children who have had secondary management of

velopharyngeal insufficiency with pharyngeal flap and sphincter pharyngoplasty seem to be at greater risk

of sleep disorder. Specific directed therapies should provide the optimum results for the correction including

tonsillectomy with partial adenoidectomy, revision pharyngoplasty, maxillary advancement and continuous

positive airway pressure for sleep.

Summary

Awareness of the risk of sleep disorders and the possible treatments in children with cleft deformities is

very important for the otolaryngologist.

Keywords

cleft lip, cleft palate, mandibular distraction, obstructive sleep apnea, Robin Sequence, sleep disordered

breathing, tongue–lip adhesion, tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy

INTRODUCTION

The awareness of sleep issues in the pediatric popu-

lation has increased over the years. The snoring

child is no longer just cute but a sign of obstruction

that can lead to cognitive and behavioral difficul-

ties. Many studies have been done to look at these

issues. One large study by Bonuck

et al.

[1] looked at

12 447 children and found that symptoms of snor-

ing and observed apnea were common. Habitual

snoring was as high as 25% and apnea 15%, whereas

‘always’ snoring was seen in over 7% and apnea in

2%. In this study, the peak for symptomatic sleep

disordered breathing was at about 3.5 years.

Perhaps spurred by the increasing awareness of

sleep disordered breathing in the population, a

number of studies have looked at this problem in

the cleft population. In many cases, it seems the

awareness has focused the clinician to ask the right

questions. Identification of historical symptoms

that define sleep apnea has not been successful in

the general population, but questioning of the cleft

population seems to have a higher rate of return. In

Muntz

et al.

[2], over 90% of sleep studies performed

on children with clefts were positive. The decision to

order the sleep study was based on the presence of

multiple symptoms related to obstructive sleep

apnea. Unfortunately, using varied weighting

schemes in both linear and cubic formulas, they

could not suggest severity using multiple factors

[2]. The MacLean study was similar in that 85%

had positive sleep studies after referral for sleep symp-

toms, 28% of which suggested severe sleep apnea [3]

and Robison andOtteson [4] suggested the same with

83.1% having obstructive sleep apnea.

Syndromes are common in children with clefts

and more so in those with isolated cleft palate. The

risk of significant obstructive sleep apnea was

Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Primary Children’s

Medical Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

Correspondence to Harlan R. Muntz, MD, FAAP, FACS, Primary

Children’s Medical Center, #4500, 100 N. Mario Capecchi Drive, Salt

Lake City, UT 84113, USA. Tel: +1 801 662 5666; fax: +1 801 662

5662; e-mail:

harlan.muntz@imail.org

Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

2012, 20:518–521

DOI:10.1097/MOO.0b013e3283585685

Reprinted by permission of Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012; 20(6):518-521.

50