Background Image
Previous Page  111 / 252 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 111 / 252 Next Page
Page Background

99

CHAPTER 5

SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT

5.3.4.1 Misconceptions about SRM

Many organisations have a misconception about SRM, for instance, some see

it as an apparatus for monitoring and improving the performance of suppliers.

This view conflicts with the broader definition of SRM as ‘a discipline of

working collaboratively with those suppliers that are critical to the success of

your organisation, with the intention of maximising the potential value of those

relationships.’ When the former perspective is adopted, SRM becomes a narrow,

one-way process that benefits the buying organisation only, i.e., there is no

win-win situation. The latter, broader view tends to create enhanced value for

both parties, leading to shared benefits in such areas as lowered costs, reduced

risk, increased supply efficiency, enhanced quality, faster time to market and

access to innovation.

5.3.4.2 Central Role

In some organisations, procurement is regarded as a price-focused function.

This perception can cause functional managers to protect their key supplier

relationships jealously and to keep procurement’s involvement to a minimum.

This may be problematic, as procurement should take a central role in co-

ordinating supplier relationships. The reason is that it is procurement that best

understands aspects such as access to supplier information. It also has a sound

understanding of an organisation’s operations.

5.3.4.3 Consolidating the Benefits

Many leading organisations already have potent SRM programmes in place

and are reaping the benefits. But SRM tends to be restricted to ‘pockets of

excellence’ in particular business units or functions, rather than being spread

across the entire enterprise. The challenge for those in procurement is to

develop the skills and capabilities that will enable them to spread the good

practices more widely.

5.3.4.4 Over-Reliance on Suppliers

When the organisation is overly dependent on its suppliers for many activities that

were previously performed in-house, the organisation’s exposure to supplier risk

also increases. For instance, when an organisation is over-reliant on a particular

supplier for key raw materials, and that supplier is declared bankrupt, the buying

organisation is likely to have a shortage of the key raw materials until it can find

a new supplier. Losses are likely to be incurred during that period. In all cases

where market dynamics force an organisation to become over-dependent on its

suppliers, mechanisms to manage supplier risk should be put in place.

5.3.4.5 Suppliers are not Held Responsible for Their Actions

Organisations frequently enter into poorly drafted contractual agreements that do

not hold suppliers accountable for their performance; do not motivate suppliers