Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  25 / 64 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 25 / 64 Next Page
Page Background www.speechpathologyaustralia.org.au

JCPSLP

Volume 19, Number 2 2017

79

9-months post-commencement point was 1.5 (SD = 0.9;

Range = 1–3). At this time point, 80% of the children were

reported to have an SR = 2 or less.

The repeated measures GEE analyses for the

assessment time effect indicated for both %SS (Wald

X

2

(2)

= 95.410,

p

< 0.001) and SR (Wald

X

2

(2) = 175.251,

p

<

0.001) that there was a statistically significant effect over

the three assessment times. The time-specific comparisons

indicated a significant reduction in stuttering with a large

effect size between the baseline scores at the initial

assessment (T1) and the 6-months post-commencement

assessment (T2) for both %SS (Wald

X

2

(1) = 56.71,

p

<

0.001, effect size 1.71) and SR (Wald

X

2

(1) = 88.69,

p

< 0.001, effect size 2.26). Subsequently, there was only

a non-significant change, with a negligible effect size,

between the 6-months post-commencement (T2) and

9-months post commencement assessment (T3) for both

%SS (

X

2

(1) = 0.655,

p

= 0.42, effect size 0.23) ) and SR

(

X

2

(1) = 0.48,

p

= 0.49, effect size 0.23) (see Table 3).

The %SS scores were comparable to the parent–clinician

agreed severity ratings (SR) taken within clinic at the same

points. The SR scale from 1 = no stutter to 10 = extremely

severe stuttering was used. A guideline update (Packman

et al., 2015) has subsequently changed the scale from

0 to 9. The mean SR for all the children assessed at the

Mean %SS

Figure 1. Mean clinician percentage syllable stuttered (%SS)

at initial assessment (n = 19), 6 months (n = 14) and 9 months

(n = 10) post-commencement of group treatment

12

1

8

6

4

2

0

Initial

assessment

6 months post-

commencement

9 months post

commencement

Mean SR

Figure 2. Mean parent–clinician severity rating (SR) at initial

assessment (n = 19), 6 months (n = 14) and 9 months (n = 10)

post-commencement of group treatment

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

Initial

assessment

6 months post-

commencement

9 months post

commencement

Table 2. Clinician percent syllables stuttered (%SS) and parent–clinician agreed severity rating (SR) at initial

assessment, 6 and 9 months post-commencement assessment

Severity measure Assessment

n

Mean

SD

Min

Max

%SS

Initial assessment

19

7.4

3.9

2.6

17.0

6 months post-commencement

14

1.4

1.7

0

5.0

9 months post-commencement

10

1.3

2.1

0

5.3

SR

Initial assessment

19

5.3

1.6

3

8

6 months post-commencement

14

1.6

1.0

1

4

9 months post-commencement

10

1.5

.9

1

3

Table 3. Intention to treat analysis using

generalised estimating equation method

comparing clinician percentage syllables stuttered

(%SS) and parent–clinician agreed severity rating

(SR) initial assessment (T1), 6 months (T2) and 9

months (T3) post-commencement

N

Wald

X

2

df

p

Effect

size

%SS 19, 14, 10 T1 vs T2 56.707 1 <.001 1.71

T2 vs T3 .655

1 .418 .23

SR 19, 14, 10 T1 vs T2 88.692 1 <.001 2.26

T2 vs T3 .479

1 .489 .27

Discussion

This clinician-led trial is the first to investigate the short-term

treatment outcomes of the LP rolling-group model in

community settings. Across all measures, the community-

based SLPs achieved clinical outcomes similar to those

benchmarks published in the literature: mean clinician hours

to completion of Stage 1 (Arnott et al., 2014), median

number of clinical visits and weeks to attain Stage 2 (Arnott

et al., 2014; O’Brian et al., 2013; Rousseau, Packman,

Onslow, Harrison, & Jones, 2007) and percentage of

syllables stuttered (%SS) at criteria for Stage 2 (Arnott et al.,

2014; de Sonneville-Koedoot et al., 2015; Jones et al.,

2005). Stuttering severity levels exhibited a statistically

significant reduction between pre-treatment and 6-months