Background Image
Previous Page  20-21 / 28 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 20-21 / 28 Next Page
Page Background

18

J A N

2 0 1 4

F E B

www.fbinaa.org www.fbinaa.org

J A N

2 0 1 4

F E B

19

never be repaid with evil, the inappropriate

behavior of others should never be used as an

excuse to lower standards.

EMOTIONS

Uncontrolled emotions can lead people

to say and do things they would never nor-

mally say or do. Emotions are also unreli-

able. They fluctuate based on circumstances,

events, and how people are treated by others.

Consequently, officers can ruin relationships

and careers if they allow their emotions to

guide their thinking, behavior, and perfor-

mance. Law enforcement officers must learn

to control their emotions when dealing with

offenders, the public, and coworkers. How

can officers guard against the damaging ef-

fects of uncontrolled emotions? The answer

is by relying on core values to direct thinking

and performance, not emotions.

Self-control, self-discipline, and profes-

sionalism are essential core values for combat-

ing heightened emotional states. The prestige

and honor of law enforcement should never be

compromised by unacceptable behavior due

to uncontrolled emotions. Law enforcement

officers, more than any other member of the

population, see firsthand the damaging effects

of uncontrolled emotions every day in their

jurisdiction. Diligence and discipline must be

maintained by officers to control thinking and

performance in the face of heightened emo-

tions. Just because an officer “feels” a certain

way does not mean he/she has free reign to

react unprofessionally. A true professional is

one who can perform exemplarily in the midst

of a heightened emotional state.

It is important to understand that emo-

tions cannot “make” anyone act a certain

way. Actions are a choice. Professional law

enforcement officers control their behavior

every day – even when experiencing height-

ened emotions. They may be angry when ar-

resting a suspect who is resisting but cannot

allow that anger to give rise to excessive force.

They may be embarrassed by something a

supervisor tells them but cannot strike back

with insubordination. They may even be sad-

dened or empathetic when having to arrest

someone for a crime committed during the

heat of passion; however, they cannot allow

these emotions to prevent them from doing

their job. If it were true that emotional peo-

ple had no control over their behavior, anar-

chy would result. Thankfully this is not the

case. Officers should be reminded of this and

allow core values to guide how they respond

in the midst of their emotions.

Regardless of how they are structured,

core values are designed to serve as a guiding

rod for how officers should think, perform,

and behave. It is for this reason that law en-

forcement administrators seek applicants

who exude a high degree of core values such

as ethics, integrity, self-discipline, motiva-

tion, and loyalty. Ideally, these core values

describe who the person is, not represent ide-

als and concepts a person chooses to follow

when convenient.

The importance of adhering to core values

in response to three specific factors –

occupa-

tional circumstances, other people within the or-

ganization, and emotions

– will be considered.

How officers respond to these three factors,

more than any others, can positively or nega-

tively affect the type of officer they become

and, ultimately, their career. For the purpose

of this article, the term “officer” refers to all

ranks and positions within the profession of

law enforcement.

Occupational Circumstances

Occupational circumstances refer to any

events, situations, or conditions law enforce-

ment officers face at work. Some of these cir-

cumstances include:

• Daily job responsibilities

• Internal departmental politics/conflict

• Supervisory expectations

• Support/resistance from the citizenry

• Hypervigilance

• Reduced staffing

• Low morale

In short, occupational circumstances

are what officers deal with day in, day out

at work. The problem arises when officers

use individual occupational circumstances to

guide their thinking and performance rather

than adhering to a solid set of core values.

The result leads to a constantly frustrated,

unmotivated, cynical officer.

An example of this phenomenon is

helpful. Officers have strong opinions regard-

ing how the courts should dispose of cases

brought before them. Often the courts dis-

pose of cases in ways contrary to many offi-

cers’ opinions (plea bargains, diversion plans,

dismissals, etc.). Many times, officers are left

feeling as if they are working in vain. As a

result, officers may use this occupational cir-

cumstance, and their disapproval, as a means

of rationalizing substandard performance

(such as failing to arrest for certain offenses

based on the belief that the case will be dis-

posed of in a certain manner). Instead of fall-

ing into this trap, officers should remember

that they took an oath of office to enforce the

law without bias or prejudice. Strict adher-

ence to the core values of integrity and ethics

should guide officers’ decision making, not

what the courts may or may not do.

The environment in which law enforce-

ment officers serve is both negative and hazard-

ous. If an officer chooses to substitute reliance

on core values for their occupational circum-

stances, many are available. These circum-

stances can lead to statements such as, “No

one cares, so why should I?” or “Nothing I do

really matters.” This is a precarious game that

is best left unplayed. It can turn an officer who

was once motivated, energetic, and profession-

al into an unstable malcontent who bases all

thoughts and actions solely on circumstances.

Other people within the

organization

Officers interact daily with people who

lie, cheat, steal, misrepresent themselves, and

deal unethically and immorally with others.

The sad fact is that these people not only make

up the criminal element of the community

but often members within the organization.

This reality is compounded when the people

behaving in this manner serve in supervisory

positions or are given immunity for such be-

havior. How officers respond to the actions

and words of other people can positively or

negatively affect thinking and performance.

Everyone knows those members within

the organization who behave unethically, im-

morally, unprofessionally, and without genu-

ine care and concern for others. Lest the rank

and file believe that chiefs and sheriffs are un-

affected by this aggravation, they should be

reminded that they work closely with city/

county managers, city/county board mem-

bers, mayors, and others who may behave

similarly. The problem comes when officers

allow the actions and words of other people

within the organization to dictate how they

will think and perform rather than adhering

to the reliability of core values.

The core values of honesty, motivation,

self-determination, and self-discipline as well

as ethics and integrity should be held higher

and guide thinking and performance more

than the unprofessional behavior of other

people within the organization. Just because

someone within the organization is allowed

to behave in inappropriate ways does not

mean individual standards should be low-

ered. The adages,

“If they can do it, why can’t

I?”

or

“That’s not fair”

should never be part

of an officer’s thinking. Just as evil should

The Importance of Core Values in the Law Enforcement Profession

continued from page 16

continued on page 24

A MESSAGE FROM OUR

CHAPLAIN

day as we prepare for our shift. As we don the bullet-resistant vest,

cinch up our Sam Brown gun belt, and place our sidearm into its hol-

ster, we also don the mental armor to take on the challenges of the day.

That “armor” protects us and, at times, we begin to cherish the armor

without recognizing its limitations.

Let me share some thoughts found in the Old Testament of the

Bible. In 1 Kings 20:11, King Ahab states the following: The king of

Israel answered,

“Tell him: ‘One who puts on his armor should not boast

like one who takes it off.’”

The King of Israel was facing possible defeat at the hands of a for-

midable foe. After trying to negotiate, King Ahab was sent word from

his adversary that his country would be nothing but ashes after the bat-

tle. With courageous determination, King Ahab sent

word to his enemy, “Tell him: ‘One who puts on his

armor should not boast like one who takes it off.’”

Simply put, until you have experienced actual

battle, you cannot imagine or speak as to what it is

like. In other words, the one who has never worn ar-

mor in a fight cannot possibly boast (or understand)

what it is like to enter the fray like the person who is

taking off his armor following a fight.

Some of you wear “armor” that bears nicks,

dents, and, occasionally, a cut that results in your be-

ing wounded, so to speak. In our everyday battle as

leaders, we have come to expect that and, as law en-

forcement leaders, you have worn your armor well.

However, while this “armor” serves us perfectly at work, we must

constantly remind ourselves to remove our “armor” before we come

home to our families. Your family is a major touchstone in your life

providing the measure of balance and foundation that can be found

nowhere else. A touchstone serves as a standard against which we mea-

sure ourselves and reminds us of what is genuine and true.

Sometimes we wear our “armor” home where it hurts those very

family members to whom we owe the greatest protection. How I

wished, during my career, I had paused more often in prayer, medita-

tion, and reflection before I came home to my family at the end of my

shift. With that, my “armor” would have been removed prior to being

with those who meant the most to me. But all too often, I forgot that

simple process and brought my armor into my home with all of its

consequences. I urge you to be aware when you need your armor on

the job and when you need to be transparent and caring at home.

More will be written this year concerning our touchstones in life

since that is our theme for 2014. In the meantime, please know I lift

you all in prayer before our Heavenly Father. May He richly guide you

as you lead officers in this most noble calling: law enforcement.

Blessings, fellow warriors!

Dan Bateman,

FBINAA Chaplain

Blessings, FellowWarriors!

G

reetings to all of my FBI National Academy Associates from

your Chaplain! I am honored to serve you in this capacity for

the next four years. I am somewhat humbled to follow in the footsteps

of our esteemed chaplain of many years,

Billy Gibson

. Billy served

this Association with distinction, honor, and determination. We owe

Billy a debt of gratitude for his service. A future article will more fully

express how much Billy has meant to the Association.

A bit about myself: I recently retired as an

inspector from the Michigan State Police after 31

years of service. I attended the 201st Session of the

FBI National Academy and, following graduation,

became active with the Michigan chapter. I served

on our Curriculum Committee, eventually chair-

ing it, was selected as the editor of our newsletter,

and then served as Chapter secretary, vice-presi-

dent, and then president in 2010.

Each year of my tenure as your chaplain will

feature a topic that supports an overarching vi-

sion or theme. This will help all of us to remember

those important principles and people that keep us

anchored and grounded.

The overarching vision/theme is

“Calling Us Back to Move Us For-

ward”

and the yearly themes are incorporated as follows:

• 2014 – Touchstones: Remembering the Important

• 2015 – Mountain Tops and Valleys: Our Journey

• 2016 – Milestones, Not Goals: Keep Moving the Finish Line

• 2017 – Remembering Home: From Beginning to End

As I said, I am here to serve you in whatever capacity I can as God

allows me. You may have noticed the title of my article,

“Blessings, fel-

low warriors”

. It is a tag line I use frequently as I address sworn officers

both publicly and in correspondence. Having served as an enlisted of-

ficer with the Michigan State Police for over 31 years (and 20 years as a

command officer), I know the difficulties we face as we lead people in

this most noble of professions. I count myself as a warrior like you.

I know, too, the struggles we face in serving others whether it

is dealing with an unpredictable public, navigating the ever-changing

winds of politics, supervising officers who need strong guidance, work-

ing within the directives of governmental decisions or budgets with

which we privately disagree but honor as is our duty, or, in the worst

case, the great burden of a line-of-duty death of one of our officers.

It is the calling of a true warrior to serve well under these difficult

circumstances. And each of you possess that strong character, drive,

and integrity – otherwise you would not have been chosen to attend

the FBI National Academy.

But the circumstances of our career sometimes have an insidious

and unknowing effect on us. As warriors, we put on our “armor” every

by Dan Bateman