Previous Page  16 / 196 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 16 / 196 Next Page
Page Background

answers and directions you need for a sound foundation.

It's going to be your business whether you see him at

the start or not, but you are going to need him at some

stage and the more familiar he is with your overall plan

the more speedily he will be able to offer advice and

protection.

THE FUTURE AND LAW

The President of the Incorporated Law Society, Mr.

Brendan McGrath, delivered an address to Dublin

Rotary on "The Future of Law".

He said that people look at law differently. Some

see it as a code of prohibitions. Others regard it con-

structively as the foundation of a living order which

guides men towards a minimum acceptable conduct.

One of the basic misconceptions on the part of many

people is that law is primarily concerned with conflict—

with law in the courts. The traditional association of

law with crime is well illustrated by the story of the lady

who was being shown over the courts and when brought

into the Court of Chancery, which at the time was

adjudicating on some problem arising out of the distri-

bution of a charitable trust, she inquired of her guide :

"Where's the prisoner?"

Since law is a system for the solution of problems

thrown up by life, conflict and clashes of interest are, of

course, inevitable. Litigation is, however, only one

aspect of the law. It is concerned with the breakdown

of human relations.

There is, however, another and more important aspect

of the law, and that is, its function as an organ of

government for the creation and preservation of an

ordered society.

Looked at in this light, law will be seen as an instru-

ment of order by which society functions in a politically

organised community. It is the means by which society

works out its purpose. It is a product and forms part of

the fabric and culture of society. As such it is a social

science and has a social function.

Prior to the nineteenth century, law was mainly built

on custom and tradition. The sanction of antiquity

gave law its justification. The learned in the law were

those who knew and could declare what had always

been the law.

The industrial revolution, however, changed the

economic and social fabric of society. Individual liberty

was conceived to be the instrument of progress.

Bentham, the prophet of

laissez-faire,

urged that man

must be free to exploit the supposedly infinite resources

of nature on a competitive basis. The law's function was

to aid and abet by the removal of all obstacles to free-

dom of contract. This concept failed. The breakdown

was something more than a change in ideology.

The uncontrolled pursuit of economic gain changed

the physical conditions of urban life. The expansion and

intensification of industrial production brought about

changes not only in the economic structure but also in

the social conditions of life.

The mushroom appearance of densely populated

industrial cities gave rise to problems concerning public

health and safety. New industrial corporations and the

trade unions gave rise to the problem of the power of

one group of men to do damage to others. When men

pooled their individual liberties to create combinations

whose survival depended upon trials of strength, the

theory of freedom was called in question.

Finally, the necessity for elimination of waste, the

need for capital transcending individual resources and

the demand for minimum security for the individual led

to the entry of the state into economic enterprise trans-

forming law into an instrument of social control.

The emergence of the welfare state and the active

participation of the state in industrial enterprise are

particular exemplifications of this development.

The society which law now serves is undergoing still

further rapid transformation. We live in a planned and

regulated economy inspired by technological advance-

ment and urged on by the speed of communication and

transport.

The growing interdependence of people, the emer-

gence of new economic institutions and concern with

social experiment have expanded the dimensions of the

law. Problems concerning economics, science, technology,

international trade and transport and the establishment

of international economic and political institutions have

extended the area of law beyond the regulation and

control of day-to-day transactions.

Law has now entered into the sphere of "social-

engineering". The community is increasingly subject to

more and more law, but of a different order to times

past.

Legislation is rapidly replacing the Common Law.

Laws regulating employment, international and uniform

laws regulating trade and commerce are substituting for

individual contract. Law affecting our environment has

now become a matter of major concern—problems

relating to the quality of air and water, noise, urban

planning, radiation, deep sea mining, highways and

traffic control call for ever increasing attention.

The emphasis has switched from private to public

law. There is a continuous making and re-making of the

law. The problem now is how to keep the law in contact

with and amenable to the needs of a rapidly changing

tenchological society.

All this calls for increasing familiarity on the part of

lawyers with socio-economic factors underlying the law.

Law must be organically related to the knowledge of

the times. It must be informed by an awareness of facts

established by the disciplines of the economist, the

scientist, the physicist and the sociologist.

Lawyers must be able to see the interaction of these

several disciplines and be able to use the data of social

and economic life. To quote Lord Radcliffe (

The Law

and Its compass)

"You will not mistake my meaning or

suppose that I depreciate one of the great humane

studies if I say that we cannot learn law by learning

law. If it is to be anything more than just a technique it

is to be so much more than itself; a -part of history and

sociology, a part of ethics and a philosophy of life."

Equally, there would seem to be a need on the part

of the business community for a sharpened awareness of

what the law means, what it is for and how it does its

job. Businessmen should have some understanding of

law as a social institution.

There can be no effective liaison between law and

business unless the business community has some appre-

ciation of the processes of the development of the law,

the limits of its competence and the nature of the insti-

tutions through which it operates. This requires the

creation of a feeling on the part of the business com-

munity for the atmosphere of the law.

It goes without saying that every businessman must

have sufficient knowledge to do his job efficiently.

Whilst it would be impossible to make everyman his

own lawyer, each must at least have some knowledge

and understanding of the legal devices which he puts to

the demand for minimum security for the individual to

use from day to day. Accountants, chartered secretaries,

students of commerce and others who have attended

commercial law courses will, of course, have received,

15