Previous Page  185 / 196 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 185 / 196 Next Page
Page Background

on the stated grounds that lie was entitled to payment

in respect of one successful unit only, refused to pay

him the full amount appropriate to two units.

The Racing Board denied that all of the rules

governing multiple event pools or jackpots were set out

in the claim; and denied that Mr. Duff in the Jackpot

Combination ticket had purchased selected horse No.

1 in the sixth race twice, as alleged or at all. It was

alleged that Mr. Duff did not inform the person from

whom he purchased the combination ticket of the num-

ber of horses in any of the races he wished to combine.

Judge's Comments

The Board also submitted that it was provided by

the rules that in the event of any dispute or difference

in relation to the jackpot, it should lie determined by

the Totalisator Manager and that his decision should

he binding on all parties. It was submitted that Mr.

Duff had not submitted the claim to the Manager.

In his judgment, Mr. Justice Pringle said that, in his

opinion, Mr. Duff was entitled to he paid for two units

and not for one. There was nothing explicit 011 the

ticket or in the rules to show that, if a purchaser

wanted to nominate a horse twice in any race, he must

insert the number of that horse twice, or that it was not

sufficient for him to indicate under the heading "Total

Selections" at the foot of a column for any race in

which he had only nominated one horse to win, that

he was nominating that horse twice by inserting the

figure "2".

"Complied with Rules"

He did not consider that the particular rule was a

sufficient indication that, if only one horse was being

nominated in a race and the punter desired to nominate

that horse twice, he must insert its number twice.

Mr. Justice Pringle said that if this was a necessary

requirement in the completion of a ticket, he thought

it should have been clearly provided for in the rules,

which was not done. He considered that a purchaser

who decided to nominate only one horse to win a

particular race hut who desired to nominate that horse

twice, could comply with the rules in either of two

ways—either by inserting the number of the horse

twice under the heading "horse numbers", or by only

inserting the horse's number once under that heading,

hut by inserting the figure "2" at the bottom of the

column for the race in question under the heading

"Total Selections".

He said that the latter course was the one which Mr.

Duff adopted and, in his opinion complied with the

rules.

Planning a Pension Scheme?

T h e best start your company could make is to have it planned by specialists.

At A L PS we have a vast wealth of specialised experience behind us. We

can design the employee benefit scheme best suited to your company's

requirements.

Get in touch with AL P S !

ALPS — The Life and Pensions Specialists.

Associated Life & Pensions Services Ltd.,

Phoenix House, South Leinster Street, Dublin 2. Te l: 717131 (25 lines).

A MEMBEROFTHECOYLE HAMILTON HAMILTON PHILLIPS GROUP

187