GAZETTE
JULY/
A
UGUST
1987
apparent than in the huge volume
of uncollected tax which has
presented successive administra-
tions with so major a problem. Nor
can there be any escaping the
widespread dissatisfaction with
the system of compensation in per-
sonal injury cases currently being
administered by the Courts.
Because these topics are so
unarguably urgent and relevant to
people's real needs, some degree
of optimism as to the prospects of
any recommendations being im-
plemented might seem reasonable.
But to have the machinery of law
reform in place is one thing: to
secure its effective implementation
in legislation is quite another. This
is a problem which is common to
law reform agencies in jurisdictions
similar to our own to a greater or
less degree. Ultimately, of course,
the Commission's role must remain
advisory, but we are convinced
that it will become not merely ad-
visory but futile as well, unless
considerable care and thought is
given to devising procedures which
give the ultimate recommendations
made by the Commission the op-
timum prospects of success in
terms of implementation.
The traditional method of pro-
ducing reports has been to publish
a "Working Paper" in the first in-
stance, await reactions to it and
then publish a final report. The ex-
perience of law reform agencies,
including this Commission, of this
procedure has been singularly dis-
heartening: the gloomy experience
has been — and I stress again that
this is not a problem unique to
Ireland — that the response tends
to be minimal. Since the Working
Paper is published to the world at
large and necessarily contains a
detailed statement of the law and
its defects along with provisional
suggestions as to its reform, it
must be produced with meticulous
care. Mo r eove r, since it is
necessarily on occasions highly
technical in its approach, a decent
interval must be allowed for those
who take the trouble to read it, to
digest its comments and come up
wi th helpful suggestions. This
whole process is immensely time
consuming and, in the vast majori-
ty of cases, wasteful. It has no
doubt the useful by-product of
making available to lawyers and
law students an up-to-date state-
ment of the law, but this is hardly
a major function of a body such as
this.
An extreme response to this pro-
blem would be simply to dispense
with any prior consultation before
the publication of a final report and
recommendations. The Commis-
sion favours a more flexible ap-
proach, which it has been putting
into practice during the first
months of its existence. In some
cases, where the contents of any
preliminary examination of the pro-
blem is necessarily technical and
legalistic, no useful purpose is serv-
ed by publication to the world at
large. In such a case, one option
which is being availed of is to cir-
culate on a limited basis preliminary
findings by the Commission in the
form of Discussion Papers. Another
is to form Working Groups of per-
sons with an interest in the topic
to assist the Commission in identi-
fying where the practical problems
are and how they can best be tackl-
ed. Yet another is to commission
other State or outside agencies to
conduct empirical research so as to
ensure that recommendations are
not divorced from what is actually
happening in the problem areas. In
the field of legal research, which is
obviously the most important
instrument at the Commission's
disposal, there can be fruitful co-
operation with the law faculties of
the third level instututions. In this
latter field, particularly valuable
results may be achieved by harnes-
sing the capacity for work and in-
tellectual energy of our young law
graduates.
All these approaches should, in
the view of the Commission,
facilitate the formulation of pro-
posals for law reform which are
soundly based in empirical and
academic research, while avoiding
the frustration and delays which
seem inevitably to flow from the
old fashioned "Working Paper"
procedure. There will, of course, be
circumstances in which the topic
being dealt with raises policy ques-
tions of such a nature as to require
more than the circulation of a
Discussion Paper on a limited basis
before the Commission frames its
proposals for reform.
If I may illustrate what has been
done so far to put these new prac-
tices into operation, I might refer to
the areas of conveyancing, debt
collection and compensation for
personal injuries. In each case,
MONEY GROWS ON
TREES
For an investment of
£10,000 upwards you can
purchase, or take a share
in, a newly planted or semi
mature forest and you-can
WATCH YOUR MONEY
GROW and IT IS TAX
FREE.
Contact Irelands leading
forestry company
GREEN BELT LTD
Virginia (049) 47521, 39152,
47171.
Wo r k i ng Groups have been
established consisting of experts in
the various fields to identify pro-
blems which have arisen and in-
dicate possible solutions. In the
area of criminal law, they have
selected for initial examination the
question of the receiving of stolen
goods, which has been giving rise
to serious problems in practice and
which clearly lies at the root of
much of the crime in our society.
A detailed Discussion Paper setting
out the existing law in this area,
identifying the problems, sum-
marising what has been done in
other jurisdictions and indicating
possible areas for reform has
already been produced by the Com-
mission and is being circulated on
a limited basis with a view to
stimulating comments. I have
referred earlier to the preliminary
investigations which are being car-
ried out in the area of child sexual
abuse. They have already involved
discussions with people involved in
the front line, such as the Rape
Crisis Centre and the Sexual
Assault Treatment Unit at the
Rotunda Hospital. The Commission
are also anxious to bring to comple-
133