GAZETTE
APRIL 1987
Industrial Engineer
Quantity Surveyor
Economist
Occupational Therapist
Speech Pathologist
Radiographer
Pastry Cook
Furniture Polisher
Actuary
Employer Nomi na t i on
Scheme: —
It really must be shown that
Australia's labour pool is unable to
fill the employer's needs and the
vacancy must be:
a) genuine.
b) The employment must be full-
time and permanent.
c) The proposed migrant must be
experienced (3— 5 years of on-
the-job training).
3 . Business Mi g r a t i on
This is confined to those going to
Australia to expand business there.
Proposed migrants must have a
successful business record, feasi-
ble business plans of potential
benefit to Australia and sufficient
capital to establish themselves.
4 . Re t i r ement Mi g r a t i on
People who wish to retire in
Australia must be over 55 and have
adequate funds.
5 . Spec i al Eligibility Mi g r a t i on
Consideration will be given to peo-
ple with a record of achievement in
creative or sporting activities
which would be seen as benefitting
Australia.
6 .
R e f u g e es
a nd
S p e c i al
Human i t a r i an Mi g r a t i on.
It should be borne in mind that
migration visas take a very long
time to process.
Readers are reminded of
something which was mentioned in
the earlier article —applications for
a migration visa for an Irish solicitor
should come from the employer in
Australia. An Irish solicitor seeking
to work as a solicitor in Australia
has little hope of a successful
outcome to his application — made
through the Australian Embassy,
Fitzwilton House, Wilton Terrace,
Dublin2 —unless he or she marries
an Australian.
I am indebted to Mr. Gavin Buckley
of Mallesons, Stephen, Jacques for
up-to-the-minute information on
the migration scene.
•
V . A . T.
blocks access to
Cour ts
VAT, in some instances, has
created inequality in the right
of access to the Courts, said
the President of the Law
Society, Mr. David Pigot, when
addressing new solicitors at the
Parchment Presentation ceremony
in March,
"It is obvious that the imposition
of VAT greatly increased the cost,
to clients not registered for VAT,
of legal representation and advice
. . . In rough and ready terms the
cost of access to the Courts for a
person registered for VAT is
approximately 20% less than for a
person who is not. I suggest that
in these circumstances the tax is
discriminatory against persons
who are not registered for VAT
and that, as all our citizens
should be entitled to equal
opportunity of access to the
Courts, the application of VAT to
solicitors' costs is arguably un-
constitutional, at least in some
instances."
He urged the Government to
bring in legislation which would
have the effect of abolishing VAT
on Solicitors' Costs certainly
in contentious matters in the
Courts.
The President added: "VAT is by
far the greatest single factor in
increasing the total amount of legal
costs paid by insurance companies
in recent years in Personal Injury
Ac t i ons, a factor that has
necessarily resulted in increased
insurance premiums to the public
at large."
Commenting on conveyancing,
the President said that an inhibiting
factor in the transfer of property is
the high level of Stamp Duty. It is
on a sliding scale, but the scale has
not been altered for many years.
As the scale provides for a higher
rate as the value of the property
increases, the effect of inflation
has been to increase the amount of
Stamp Duty by a factor greater
than inflation.
" I therefore urge the Govern-
ment to widen the bands, thereby
reducing the incidence of Stamp
Duty on residential properties in
particular. This hopefully would
help to stimulate what has been a
very poor market for several years."
Law Reform Commi ss ion
A reception was held recently to
mark the appointment of Mr.
Justice Ronan Keane as the new
President of the Commission, as
well as the appointment of new
Commissioners. In the May issue
of the Gazette, we intend to
publish an abridged text of the
address of the Taoiseach, Charles
J. Haughey, T.D., and of the
speech of the President.
As well as Mr. Justice Ronan
Keane, the other members of the
Commission are:
Simon P. O'Leary, former Senior
Legal Assistant to the Director of
Public Prosecutions;
John Buckley, Solicitor, partner
in Messrs. Hickey Beauchamp,
Kirwan & O'Reilly, former Junior
Vice-President of the Law Society;
William Duncan, Senior Lecturer
in Law and Registrar of Trinity
College, Dublin;
Maureen Gaffney, Senior Clinical
Psychologist, Eastern Health
Board, Course Organiser, E.H.B./
Trinity College Training Scheme in
Clinical Psychology.
In Brief
V
)
Food for Thought?
In the Central Criminal Court
recently, a jury returned a verdict
of not guilty on a Dublin restaurant
proprietor charged with falsely
imprisoning a patron of the
restaurant, who tendered a cheque
in payment of a bill amounting to
over £150.00. The defendant was
alleged to have detained the
customer and some of his party
from 11.45 p.m. until 4.20 a.m.,
while
argument
took
place
concerning payment of the bill. The
defendant called the Gardai who
appear to have taken the view that
the defendant was not entitled to
detain the people concerned. The
jury's verdict was unanimous, but
reports so far available do not
relate whether the bill was
ultimately paid!
(Contd. on p.87)
85