Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  192 / 536 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 192 / 536 Next Page
Page Background

178

VERONIKA BÍLKOVÁ

CYIL 7 ȍ2016Ȏ

of older persons may vary even within a single society.

17

People also tend to associate

older age with certain features which may be both positive (wisdom, experience,

stability) and negative (health problems, dependence, frailty). Thus, while

“the ageing

process is /…/ a biological reality which has its own dynamic, largely beyond human

control”,

18

the definition of old age and older persons is socially constructed and

conditioned. Unlike certain other special groups, older persons do not exhibit any

in-born feature (sex, colour of the skin) that would easily tell them apart. Unlike

children, the other special group defined by age, older persons do not have at least

one clear determinant point in time (death not being a real equivalent to birth,

because while we all born as children, we do not all die as older persons). The group

to which older persons bear the strongest resemblance seems to be that of disabled

people, as the concept of disability is also socially constructed.

19

The uncertainty as to who older persons are translates into the plurality of terms

used to label them and the uncertainty as to which of these terms would be the most

appropriate in the legal discourse. In natural sciences, such as medicine and geriatrics,

the terms

elderly, old people/persons, and elders

are mostly in use. None of these terms,

however, seems suitable in the legal context.

20

The terms elderly and old people/

persons have negative connotations, suggesting frailty, inability or dependence. The

term elders may be misleading, because in addition to persons advanced in age, it also

denotes persons with special wisdom or spiritual or community leaders. The WHO

in its documents refers to

older adults.

This term, however,

“rolls off the tongue thickly

in a way that suggests a euphemism for something less comfortable, a reluctance to offend

perhaps”.

21

Next in row is the term

seniors,

which is common in the popular literature.

It is borrowed from the Latin

senior,

a comparative of

senex

which means old or

senior. Originally, it referred mainly to a social status and, in fact, it yielded titles of

respect in English (Sir) and in other languages (

sire

in French,

señor

in Spanish). This

meaning has been gradually abandoned and nowadays, the term mostly describes

people of a certain age. In some countries, however,

senior

gets a narrow meaning,

as it is reserved for people benefiting from certain social (governmental) programs.

In view of all these linguistic pitfalls, the term

older persons

seems the most suitable

(or the least unsuitable) for the legal vocabulary. This term is used in most UN

sources and progressively makes its way to official documents of other international

17

Thane, for instance, shows how in the 19

th

-early 20

th

European societies, the old age limit was construed

differently for women (45-55) and men (55-75), depending on the moment they typically underwent

a transition in their livelihood. THANE, Pat, The muddled history of retiring at 60 and 65,

New

Society,

Vol. 45, 1978, pp. 234-236.

18

GORMAN, Mark,

supra note 15,

cit. in WHO,

Definition of an older or elderly person, supra note 12.

19

See WENDELL, Susan,

The Rejected Body,

New York: Routledge, 1996 (especially chapter 2: The Social

Construction of Disability, pp. 57-72).

20

SCHMITT, Alex, “Elders?” “Older Adults?” “Seniors?” Language Matters,

GeriPal,

21 March 2012.

21

Ibid.