Previous Page  33 / 60 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 33 / 60 Next Page
Page Background www.speechpathologyaustralia.org.au

ACQ

Volume 13, Number 1 2011

31

Professional issues

(Carlton, 2008). The National Registration and Accreditation

Scheme for the Health Professions was introduced in July

2010 and provides a framework for occupational regulation

that is enabled through statutory registration. Statutory

registration supports regulatory functions through legislated

scopes of practice, codes of conduct and restriction of

profession titles. These functions are achieved by controlling

entry to a profession, maintaining a register of qualified

health professionals, accrediting programs of study, setting

standards of clinical practice and codes of conduct,

investigating and dealing with complaints, and managing

issues regarding practitioner ill-health (Carlton, 2008).

Ten professions are currently included in the scheme,

including chiropractors, dentists, medical practitioners,

nurses and midwives, optometrists, osteopaths,

pharmacists, physiotherapists and podiatrists. These

professions were included on the basis that they already

operated within a statutory registration framework in most

jurisdictions in Australia. In July 2008, the Australian Health

Ministers’ Advisory Council (AHMAC) called for submissions

from partially regulated professions wishing to be considered

for inclusion in the scheme. Speech pathology is considered

to be a partially regulated profession given that it is a

registered profession only in the state of Queensland.

Speech Pathology Australia (SPA) in conjunction with the

Speech Pathologists Board of Queensland, on behalf of

the speech pathology profession in Australia, lodged a

submission to be included in the National Registration

and Accreditation Scheme. The submission conveyed the

profession’s intent that statutory registration of the speech

pathology profession across all jurisdictions would provide

a quality assurance and risk management framework to

safeguard public safety, thereby addressing the risks of

physical, social and emotional harm posed by speech

pathology practice. Sound evidence was provided of the

disjointed nature of existing regulatory and governance

mechanisms that are unable to apply sufficient powers

across the entire profession to enable the public to be

effectively protected. Mechanisms provided by the National

Registration and Accreditation Scheme including establishing

and instating a professional board, would enable the public

to identify those speech pathologists (SPs) who possess the

necessary competencies and qualifications to deliver speech

pathology services, and provide the public with an avenue

for addressing complaints about services or professionals

(SPA & The Speech Pathologists Board of Queensland,

2008). This is in contrast to functions undertaken by SPA,

The National Registration and Accreditation

Scheme for the Health Professions

commenced in July 2010. Unfortunately, the

speech pathology profession’s submission for

inclusion in to the National Registration and

Accreditation Scheme was unsuccessful. The

submission prepared jointly by Speech

Pathology Australia (SPA) and the Speech

Pathologists Board of Queensland argued that

existing governance and regulatory

mechanisms directed at establishing and

monitoring clinical practice standards,

competency and professional conduct failed

to provide integrated protection to the public.

The advancement and expansion of the

profession’s scope of practice was also

discussed, including the risks to the public

where these roles are performed without the

competency to do so.

In light of the profession’s unsuccessful

application to be included in the National

Accreditation and Registration Scheme, the

speech pathology profession needs to

determine processes for practice regulation

such that the public can be assured of the

competency of the entire speech pathology

workforce, from entry-level practice, to more

advanced and specialised roles. This paper

discusses the current inadequacies in the

profession’s governance and regulatory

mechanisms, and suggests that a career and

professional development framework could be

implemented as a quality assurance

mechanism to address these issues.

Regulation of practice to ensure

public safety

Occupational regulation of health professions is a

mechanism through which the public accessing health care

services is protected through effective monitoring of the

safety and quality of care delivered by health professionals

Ensuring the competency

of the speech pathology

workforce

The need for a career and professional development

framework

Michelle Cimoli

Michelle Cimoli

This article

has been

peer-

reviewed

Keywords

CAREER

FRAMEWORK

COMPETENCY

PRACTICE

REGULATION

SCOPE OF

PRACTICE

WORKFORCE