Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  115 / 154 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 115 / 154 Next Page
Page Background

Study Information,

Continued

Statistical

evaluation

After data collection, outliers were detected using Cochran and Grubbs tests. The

number and coded identity of statistical outlier laboratories are included in this

report.

Average chloride concentrations, standard deviations of repeatability (S

r

) and

relative standard deviations of repeatability (RSD

r

) were estimated from blind

duplicates in MLT samples. The duplicates were assigned to be analyzed on the

same day.

Standard deviations of reproducibility (S

R

), relative standard deviations of

reproducibility (RSD

R

), and HORRAT values (RSD

R

/predicted RSD

R

) were also

estimated.

Details on statistical analysis can be found in the “Appendix D: Guidelines for

Collaborative Study Procedures To Validate Characteristics of a Method of

Analysis” of the Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 18th

Edition (2005).

Materials, Method and Laboratories

Matrices

The study took place using SPIFAN matrices, which represent most of the

products in the scope of the project (Infant Formula and Adult Nutritionals

made from any combination of milk, soy, rice, whey, hydrolyzed protein, starch

and amino acids, with and without intact protein). In addition, IDF matrixes

were added to this MLT in planning to be able to expand the scope to include

dairy. All samples were codified.

The complete list of samples can be found in Annex A.

Homogeneity

Tests

SPIFAN matrixes:

Homogeneity tests were performed by analyzing several compounds (i.e.

calcium, manganese, zinc, pyridoxine and tocopheryl acetate). The testing

was performed by Covance Laboratories. The report is available upon request

at AOAC.

IDF matrixes:

Homogeneity tests were performed by analyzing several compounds (i.e.

calcium, manganese, zinc, fat and chloride). The testing was performed by

MUVA kempten. The report is available upon request from MUVA.

Method

The full method description is given in Annex B.

Participating

laboratories

Twenty three laboratories tentatively agreed to participate in the study. The

complete list can be found in Annex C. Random codes were attributed to the

laboratories for identification.

2016.03 (APRIL 2017) - MTE-01/03

MLT REPORT

FOR ERP USE ONLY

DO NOT DISTRIBUTE