Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  29 / 154 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 29 / 154 Next Page
Page Background

Method Performance

Part 1 of the method evaluation within participating laboratories involved the

calibration parameters the LOQ and a practice sample. The NIST 1849a CRM was

selected for this purpose because it was readily available in most laboratories,

since the expected values are known, participant could get instant feedback on

the method was working appropriate. It provides additional confidence that no

bias in the operation of the method amongst all participants. Two participating

laboratories showed bias for the NIST 1849a and were not qualified. All other 12

laboratories provided acceptable data for the practice sample. All collaborators

returned acceptable calibration parameters based on linear regression

correlation coefficients or quadratic regression (r

2

0.9942-1.0000).

Laboratory 2 was not capable to measure P. Laboratories having problems with

Fe, Cu, Mn, at low range in placebos and dairy products were excluded from

statistical treatment (negative values). All remaining data were statistically

analyses using the AOAC protocol for overall mean, intra-laboratory repeatability

(Sr), repeatability relative standard deviation (RSDr), inter-laboratory

reproducibility (SR), reproducibility relative standard deviation (RSDR) and

HorRat. Cochran (p=0.025, 1 tail) and Grubbs (single and double), p=0.025, 2-

tail) tests were utilized to determine outliers. In some instances statistical

outliers were identified but deemed reasonable to do so, these were retained in

the data set for calculation of precision of method.

Results of the laboratories showed no bias with the certified values from NIST

(also measured with ICP-AES)

Table 2: Interlaboratory study results for NIST 1849a with certified values obtained by

ICP-AES.

Summary of the summary tables is shown in the next three tables for infant

formula and adult nutrition product, for the Placebo samples and for the dairy

samples.

Element

Mean (mg/kg)

Calcium (Ca)

5302

5253 ± 51

Copper (Cu)

19.47

19.78 ± 0.26

Iron (Fe)

174.0

175.6 ± 2.9

Magnesium (Mg)

1634

1648 ± 36

Manganese (Mn)

48.87

49.59 ± 0.97

Phosphorus (P)

4009

3990 ± 140

Potassium (K)

9319

9220 ± 110

Sodium (Na)

4269

4265 ± 83

Zinc (Zn)

152.6

151

± 5.6

Certified value (mg/kg)

2011.14 (APRIL 2017) - MTE-01/03

MLT REPORT

FOR ERP USE ONLY

DO NOT DISTRIBUTE