Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  49 / 140 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 49 / 140 Next Page
Page Background

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANISMS PANEL, VERSION

5

Environmental  Factors For Validating Biological Threat Agent Detection Assays

1

2

[Adapted from the Environmental Factors Panel approved by SPADA on June 10, 2010.] 

3

4

The Environmental Factors Studies supplement the biological threat agent near‐neighbor exclusivity 

5

testing panel.   There are three parts to Environmental Factors studies:  part 1 ‐  environmental matrix 

6

samples;  part 2 ‐ the environmental organisms study; and part 3 ‐ the potential interferants applicable 

7

to Department of Defense applications.

1

8

9

Part 1: 

10

11

Environmental Matrix Samples ‐ Aerosol Environmental Matrices  

12

13

Method developers shall obtain environmental matrix samples that are representative and consistent 

14

with the collection method that is anticipated to ultimately be used in the field.  This includes 

15

considerations that may be encountered when the collection system 

is

deployed operationally such as 

16

collection medium, duration of collection, diversity of geographical areas that will be sampled, 

17

climatic/environmental conditions that may be encountered and seasonal changes in the regions of 

18

deployment.  

19

20

 Justifications for the selected conditions that were used to generate the environmental matrix and 

21

limitations of the validation based on those criteria must be documented. 

22

23

Method developers shall test the environmental matrix samples for interference using  samples 

24

inoculated with a target biological threat agent sufficient to achieve 95% probability of detection. 

25

26

Cross‐reactivity testing will include sufficient samples and replicates to ensure each environmental 

27

condition is adequately represented

.  

28

29

30

31

Interference from Soil 

32

To evaluate robustness to soil interferents, samples of each regional soil types* should be spiked at

2x, 

33

5x and

10x AMDL with the archetype organism (usually specified in the SMPR for AMDL testing, such as 

34

strain CO92 for

Yersinia pestis

 in SMPR 2016.008) and then the samples evaluated for inhibition.  

35

Inhibition testing should be done using intact target organisms so that potential interference can be 

36

determined.   

37

38

39

* Arizona Test Dust is available as a baseline starting point. 

40

41

42

1

Added in June 2015 for the Department of Defense project.