![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0049.jpg)
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANISMS PANEL, VERSION
5
Environmental Factors For Validating Biological Threat Agent Detection Assays
1
2
[Adapted from the Environmental Factors Panel approved by SPADA on June 10, 2010.]
3
4
The Environmental Factors Studies supplement the biological threat agent near‐neighbor exclusivity
5
testing panel. There are three parts to Environmental Factors studies: part 1 ‐ environmental matrix
6
samples; part 2 ‐ the environmental organisms study; and part 3 ‐ the potential interferants applicable
7
to Department of Defense applications.
1
8
9
Part 1:
10
11
Environmental Matrix Samples ‐ Aerosol Environmental Matrices
12
13
Method developers shall obtain environmental matrix samples that are representative and consistent
14
with the collection method that is anticipated to ultimately be used in the field. This includes
15
considerations that may be encountered when the collection system
is
deployed operationally such as
16
collection medium, duration of collection, diversity of geographical areas that will be sampled,
17
climatic/environmental conditions that may be encountered and seasonal changes in the regions of
18
deployment.
19
20
Justifications for the selected conditions that were used to generate the environmental matrix and
21
limitations of the validation based on those criteria must be documented.
22
23
Method developers shall test the environmental matrix samples for interference using samples
24
inoculated with a target biological threat agent sufficient to achieve 95% probability of detection.
25
26
Cross‐reactivity testing will include sufficient samples and replicates to ensure each environmental
27
condition is adequately represented
.
28
29
30
31
Interference from Soil
32
To evaluate robustness to soil interferents, samples of each regional soil types* should be spiked at
2x,
33
5x and
10x AMDL with the archetype organism (usually specified in the SMPR for AMDL testing, such as
34
strain CO92 for
Yersinia pestis
in SMPR 2016.008) and then the samples evaluated for inhibition.
35
Inhibition testing should be done using intact target organisms so that potential interference can be
36
determined.
37
38
39
* Arizona Test Dust is available as a baseline starting point.
40
41
42
1
Added in June 2015 for the Department of Defense project.