Previous Page  21 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 21 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

PET scans can informand improve treatment of oesophageal

adenocarcinoma

P

ET scans can be used to assess tumour response

to initial chemotherapy and may allow for the tai-

loring of further chemotherapy in patients with

oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

This conclusion was based on initial results of a ran-

domised, phase II, federally fundedAlliance for Clinical

Trials in Oncology, Cancer and Leukemia Group B trial

of PET scan-directed combined modality therapy for

oesophageal cancer.

KarynA. Goodman, MD, of the University of Colorado

School of Medicine, Aurora, explained that, despite

aggressive chemoradiotherapy, and surgery, the prog-

nosis for patients with oesophageal cancer is poor, with

fewer than 50% surviving 5 years after diagnosis. Ways

to monitor treatment effectiveness are urgently needed

to improve outcomes.

PET scans are routinely used to guide therapy decisions

in lymphoma but are only beginning to be explored for

this purpose in solid tumours. The study is among the

first to show the benefit of PET imaging in directing

presurgery treatment decisions in oesophageal cancer.

Patients with stage 2–3 oesophageal and gastroesoph-

ageal junction adenocarcinoma typically receive 5.5

weeks of chemoradiotherapy, followed by surgery. Neo-

adjuvant chemoradiation has been shown to improve

survival over surgery alone. Several chemotherapy reg-

imens are available for use during chemoradiation,

yet no reliable method predicts whether a particular

chemotherapy will be effective in a given patient.

Following an initial PET scan, 257 patients with stage

2–3 oesophageal and gastroesophageal junction ade-

nocarcinoma were randomised to one of two induction

chemotherapy regimens: modified fluorouracil + leu-

covorin and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-6) or carboplatin/

paclitaxel.

A PET scan was repeated after the first few cycles

of induction therapy. If the PET scan suggested that

the induction chemotherapy had worked, patients con-

tinued with the same chemotherapy regimen during

chemoradiation.

If the PET scan revealed that the induction chemo-

therapy regimen was not effective, chemotherapy

was changed to the other of the two regimens dur-

ing chemoradiation. Overall, 39 of 129 patients who

received FOLFOX-6 induction chemotherapy and 49

of 128 who received carboplatin/paclitaxel switched

chemotherapy regimens after the PET scan.

Among patients who switched to an alternative chemo-

therapy after induction therapy, 15.6% ultimately

achieved a pathologic complete response. In prior stud-

ies, where presurgery chemotherapy was not changed

based on a PET scan, the complete pathologic response

rate among patients with tumours not responsive to

induction chemotherapy as measured by PET scan

was only 5%. Prior research suggested a link between

pathologic complete response and longer survival in

oesophageal cancer.

Dr Goodman said, “In this study, we are adding

induction chemotherapy before chemoradiation and

showing that PET scanning after induction chemother-

apy to assess response helps guide course corrections

quickly to maximise patient benefit from chemother-

apy. Though our approach does lengthen a patient’s

time before surgery, we found that assessing treatment

efficacy with PET scanning can improve efficacy as

shown by the ability to achieve a pathologic complete

response.”

PET scans are covered byMedicare in the US for staging

and evaluation of treatment response for oesophageal and

gastroesophageal junction cancers. The study showed

that PET scans can be used to help guide therapy deci-

sions for patients with oesophageal and gastroesophageal

junction cancers. “We still need, however,” said Dr Good-

man, “to further refine what is the most effective regimen

for oesophageal cancer.”

PracticeUpdate Editorial Team

In this study, we are adding

induction chemotherapy

before chemoradiation and

showing that PET scanning

after induction chemotherapy

to assess response helps

guide course corrections

quickly to maximise patient

benefit from chemotherapy.

Though our approach does

lengthen a patient’s time

before surgery, we found that

assessing treatment efficacy

with PET scanning can

improve efficacy as shown

by the ability to achieve a

pathologic complete response.

We still need, however, to

further refine what is the

most effective regimen

for oesophageal cancer.

ASCO GI 2017

21

VOL. 2 • NO. 2 • 2017