Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  16 / 27 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 16 / 27 Next Page
Page Background

16

• All students are supported by highly prepared and effective

teachers and school leaders

• Every school offers a safe and healthy learning environment

for all students.

• All English learners achieve proficiency in English within five

years of their identification as English Learners.

IASA:

What are your thoughts on striking the right mix

of balancing test scores and growth on the ESSA plan?

Dr. Smith:

The importance of growth and to have it weighted

so heavily was critical. If we are honest, kids come in with

varying degrees of capacity at each grade level, so our

ability to a make commitment to student growth each year

was critical.

I recognize the work of moving kids up sometimes multiple

grade levels is really important and has significant value.

There was no way to really account for that. Before we had a

binary system where students were proficient, or they weren’t.

If you were not proficient, you were a failing school, when in

fact, you could be doing remarkable things. Now there’s a

different way of talking about it and that is probably the most

significant transition.

IASA:

What is the biggest misconception you’ve heard

about the Illinois’ ESSA plan?

Dr. Smith:

Unless people are really engaged, I still think there

is a sense it’s just No Child Left Behind with a new name. So

maybe it’s not a misconception but some people still haven’t

really understood what we’re doing. When people see the

work, they might see it is in fact different.

IASA:

What are the next steps with ESSA

implementation?

Dr. Smith:

The biggest and most critical piece in all of this is

the peer-to-peer network, creating opportunities for practice

sharing, positive stories and really shaping the narrative in

Illinois about schools, with districts and educators taking

responsibility to improve academic and social outcomes for

the kids. That is the force of this.

I think at the heart of that for us is the IL-Empower work.

The core of that is focusing first and foremost on those

schools that still have the highest need. There is more

autonomy now and using the quality rubric to ask a set of

clear-guiding questions and have much more clear

language about how to get help in different areas.

Overall, we’re just much better and clearer about how we’re

going to be talking to each other and targeting support.

IASA:

What were the main takeaways from ISBE’s

yearlong study into the teacher shortage?

Dr. Smith:

The most important thing is that we hear you.

People in schools have been saying there is a real need to be

addressing the shortage of teachers.

This report

took into consideration the entire range.

Recruitment, retention, the pipeline, preparation, diversity

and any other piece was considered.

The board reviewed the report and will talk about

recommendations. They’re considering those and will come

back. It’s open for public comment right now. If anybody has

comments, please get those in by October 2. (Comments can

be emailed to

teachillinois@isbe.net )

.

IASA:

Could the basic skills test be eliminated or cut

scores be reduced?

Dr. Smith:

What I did say recently is that I am hard pressed to

find evidence to defend it. If people have been accepted into

a program, the acceptance criteria means the person has met

some sort of rigorous standard in the first place and completed

coursework and demonstrated mastery of content. If there

is another exam that has a disparate pass rate and tends to

exclude people of color, it seems to me there is something

going on with that assessment. Right now, I don’t see a reason

to keep it.

IASA:

Would eliminating the test require legislative

approval or could you do it administratively?

Dr. Smith:

That’s a board activity, so we will have

conversations with the board about what they’re going

to recommend.

IASA:

How quickly can things get moving with

recommendation in the report?

Dr. Smith:

The board will consider action in October.

I will say there is such a desire to do something, so I

would expect some things definitely to happen in the

spring session.

IASA:

What was the thinking behind changing the

disbursement with the Early Childhood Block Grant?

Dr. Smith:

These are five-year cycles, and we just finished the

second of two cycles that had the same participants. At the

outset of the last five-year cycle there was a commitment to a

re-competition that would open up the ability to get funding to

the whole state. That hadn’t been possible in the last 10 years.

What happened was everyone was eligible to apply and had

the same common standards and criteria. Getting the passing