Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  267 / 488 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 267 / 488 Next Page
Page Background

258

Wiley IFRS: Practical Implementation Guide and Workbook

demonstrate the last transaction does not reflect fair value (e.g., because it was not on

arm's-length terms but a distress sale), the last transaction price is adj usted, as appropriate.

The fair value of a portfolio of financia l instruments is the product of the number of units

of the instrument and its quoted market price. Therefore, portfolio factors are not

considered in determining fair value. For instance, a control premium associated with

holding a controlling interest or a liquidity discoun t associated with holding a large block

of instruments that cannot be rapidly sold in the market would not be considered in

determining fair value. Although such factors may affect the price that is paid for a group

of instruments in an actual transaction, the effect of such factors is in pract ice diffi cult to

quantify.

(b) For assets or liabilities that are not quoted in active markets, fair value is determined using

valua tion techniqu es,

such as discount ed cash flow models or option pricing models. Such

valuation techn iques estimate the price that would have been paid in an arm's-length trans–

action motivated by normal business considerations on the balance sheet date. If an ent ity

uses a valuation technique to determine fair value, that technique should incorporate all

factors that market participants would consider in setting a price, be consistent with ac–

cepted economic methodologies for pricing financial instruments, and maximize the use of

market inputs.

The fair value of financial liabilit ies incorporates the effect of the entit y' s own credit risk;

that is, the higher the credit risk, the lower the fair value of the liability . However, the fair

value of a financial liability that has a demand feature (e.g., a demand deposit liability) is

not lower than the amount repayable on demand, discount ed from the first date the amount

could be required to be repaid.

Practical Insight

Often the fair value of a debt instrument that does not have a quoted rate or price can be de–

termined by scheduling the cash flows and discounting them using the applicable current mar–

ket interest rate for debt instruments that have substantially the same terms and characteristics

(similar remaining maturity, cash flow pattern, credit quality, currency risk, collateral, and

interest basis) for which quoted rates in active markets exis t. These and other techn iques for

determining fair value are discussed in finance and valuation textbooks.

7.000

7,000

Examples

Financial Assets at Fair Value through Profit or Loss

Assume Entity A on December 15. 2006. acquires 1.000 shares in Entity B

at

a per share price of

$55 fo r a total of $55.000 and classifies them as at fa ir value through profit or loss. On Decem–

ber

31.

2006. the quoted price ofEntity B increases to

$62.

such that the fair value ofall shares held

in Entity B

/IOW

equals $62.000. On January

1.

2007, Entity A sells the shares for

a

total of $62.000.

In this case. the

journal

entries would be

December 15 2006

Dr Financial asse ts

atfair

value through profit or loss

55,000

Cr Cash

55.000

December 31 2006

Dr Financial assets

at

fai r value through profit or loss

Cr Profit or loss

January

I 2007

Dr Cash

Cr Financial assets

at

fair value through profit or loss

62,000

62.000