Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  396 / 488 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 396 / 488 Next Page
Page Background

Chapter

34/

Share-Based Payments (IFRS 2)

385

5.2 Thus the cumulative expe nse recogni zed at the rep orting date is the fair va lue on the rep ort ing

da te times the amount of the vesting period that has lapsed. An y change in the fair va lue bet ween

the ves ting date and the settleme nt date is recogni zed immediately.

Case Study 3

An entity issues share appreciation rights on July I.

20X5,

and the entity's year-end is June

30, 20X6.

The rights vest on June

30, 20X9.

The value of the share appreciation rights was

$1

million at the

beginning of the year. The fair value on June

30, 20X6,

had increased by

$600,000.

Required

What is the expense for share appreciation rights for the year ended June

30, 20X6?

Solution

The expense for the year would increase to

$400,000

from

$250,000

per year

(250

+

600 / 4),

leaving the

remaining balance of

$1.2

million to be recognized over the remaining three-year period. If the share ap–

preciation rights were to be settled in

2X

II, any change in the fair value between

20X9

and

2X

I I would

be shown in the financial statements immediately.

5.3 Unlike equity-settled tran sactions, any redu cti on in the va lue of the award is recognized im–

medi atel y, even if the award is not ex e rcised. The payment of a cas h-settled share- based tran sac–

tion can occur after the servi ces are rendered.

6. TRANSACTIONS THAT CAN BE SETTLED FOR SHARES OR CASH

6.1 Some sha re-based paym ent tran sact ions allow the ent ity or the employee the choice as to

whe ther to settle the tran sacti on in cas h or by issuin g equity ins trume nts. An employee may have

the right to choose be tween a payment equal to the market price of the shares o r be g ive n sha res

subj ect

to

certain cond itions-for example, not being able to sell them for a period of time. Th e

accounting for this type of instrument depends on which part y has the cho ice of settleme nt meth od

and the ex tent to which the enti ty has incu rred a liability.

6.2 If the employee has the right to choose the settleme nt meth od, the entity is deem ed to have

issued a compound fin anci al ins trument (i.e., it has issued an instrument with a debt element-the

ca sh component-and an equity eleme nt-whe re the employee has the right to receiv e equity

instruments).

6.3 If the fair va lue of the goods or services received can be measured directly and easily, the eq–

uit y element is determined by taking the fair va lue of the goods or se rvices less the fair value of the

debt element of thi s instrument. T he debt eleme nt is ess entially the cash pa yment that will occur. If

the fair va lue of the goods or se rvices is measured by referen ce to the fa ir valu e of the equity in–

strume nts given, the who le of the compo und instrument sho uld be fai r valued. The equity elemen t

becomes the d ifference between the fair va lue of the equity instrumen ts granted less the fair val ue

of the debt component.

Case Study 4

An entity has purchased property. plant, and equipment for

$10

million. The supplier can choose how

the purchase price can be settled. The choices are the receipt of I million shares of the entity in one

year's time or the receipt of a cash payment in six months' time equivalent to the market value of

800,000

of the entity's shares.

It

is estimated that the fair value of the first alternative would be

$ 11

mil–

lion and the fair value of the second alternative would be

$9

million.

Required

Explain how this transaction is accounted for.

Solution

When the entity receives the property, plant, and equipment, it should record a liability of

$9

million and

an increase in equity of

$ 1

million (the difference between the value of the property, plant, and equip–

ment and the fair value of the liability).