Previous Page  163 / 322 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 163 / 322 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

JULY/AUGIJST 1984

We show

a greater interest

on other

people's money.

Ci ty of Dub l in Ba nk PLC. is a

p u b l i c l imi t ed c omp a ny, quo t ed

o n T h e S t o ck Ex c h a n ge — I r i sh.

It is a b a n k l i censed by t he

Ce n t r a l B a nk of I re l and a nd

d e p o s i t s p l aced wi th u s have

T r u s t ee S t a t u s . We a re also a n

App r oved Ba nk by t he

I n c o r p o r a t ed Law Soc i e ty to

a c c ept c l i en t s' f u n d s on depos i i.

We h a ve long expe r i ence dea l i ng

w i t h So l i c i t ors a nd provide t he

pe r f ect servi ce in t e rms of

a c c e p t i ng d e po s i ts on d ema nd

s u p p o r t ed by t he best ma r ket

depo s i t r a t e s.

P h o ne u s now for a quo t e.

CITYof

D U B U n Q b A N K

2 Lower Merrion Street, Dublin 2. Phone 760141 763225.

requested them, is not valid. The [local] Minor [Ice]

Hockey Association does not recommend the use of

helmets when playing league games. You put on a

helmet, or you don't play. Students must be told,

when necessary, 'wear goggles'."

29

(2) Supervision in School Playgrounds

It is beyond argument that some degree of supervision

is necessary where children are playing in school play-

grounds but the courts have been anxious to make it plain

that too high a standard of care will not be demanded. As

O Dálaigh C.J. said in

Lennon

-v-

McCarthy

30

:

"When normally healthy children are in the play-

ground it is not necessary that they should be under

constant supervision."

Similarly, in the English decision of

Rawsthorne

-v-

Ottley

n

, Hilbery J. expressed the view that:

"it is not the law, and never has been the law, that a

schoolmaster should keep boys under supervision

during every moment of their school lives."

The Irish cases present interesting examples of the

range of cases that can arise under the general heading of

supervision. In

Ryan

-v-

Madden

32

, the failure of a

national school teacher to supervise young pupils,

including the plaintiff, aged five, when they were leaving

the building at the end of school hours was held to be

negligence where the child slid down the bannisters from

the upper floor (where the class-room was).

In

O'Gorman

-v-

Crotty

33

, a ten-year-old pupil, when

being chased during play in the school playground, fell

over one of the several wooden blocks which were lying in

the playground. The blocks were sometimes used to

support boards for use as seats, but appear to have served

no positive function as play objects. In holding the school

manager and principal teacher liable, O'Byrne J. stated:

155