Background Image
Previous Page  44 / 52 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 44 / 52 Next Page
Page Background

vested in her career as a performer? More broadly, why was he

so invested in the rich, upper-class women he called his

“swans”? And why choose

Laura

, a mystery about a woman

who’s the subject of an æsthete’s murderous obsession, a man

who, if not gay, is certainly not straight? Pugh unearths fasci-

nating details, but I kept waiting for him to make some sense

of it all.

When he does offer some analysis, a different kind of ques-

tion arises. For example, he goes to great lengths to demon-

strate the inadequacy of Capote’s script for the 1974 film of

The Great Gatsby

, which was rejected in favor of one by Fran-

cis Ford Coppola. But the interesting question is why Capote

proved unequal to this assignment. He was considered to be

a reliable, hard worker by the studios, and Pugh documents

the success of his screenplays for

Beat the Devil

,

Indiscre-

tions of an American Wife,

and especially

The Innocents

. So

what happened?

Such questions do not detract from Pugh’s achievement in

unearthing a bounty of archival material, much of it ephemeral.

Movies and television were not the most important of Capote’s

concerns, but they were certainly more important than is com-

monly recognized. Pugh offers scholars a great gift by provid-

ing what he calls a “Cinema Capoteana,” a bibliography of all

of his screenplays and all adaptations of his work.

________________________________________________________

Jeff Solomon is a lecturer at the University of Southern California.

His book

Fabulous Potency: Truman Capote and Gertrude Stein

will

be published next year.

44

The Gay & Lesbian Review

/

WORLDWIDE

career as a screenwriter, an actor, and as a theatrical and cine-

matic character both in film and on television. The archival

work on Capote’s unproduced teleplays is especially interest-

ing and unexpected. Anyone seeking a handy guide to

Uncle

Sam’s Hard Luck Hotel

, Capote’s unproduced 1973 teleplay for

an NBC series about a halfway house for parolees, need look

no further.

Pugh is more interested in cataloguing Capote’s career than

in analyzing its contents. For instance, he records Capote’s

thoughts on his own and others’ fame and notes the unusual

prominence of his subject’s gay persona, but he doesn’t ask

how this celebrity came about, much less what it meant to his

public. In general, his critical apparatus is defined by noticing

how queerness creeps into adaptations of Capote’s work, de-

spite considerable censorship. Much of this is fascinating, es-

pecially in unusual cases such as the adaptation of Capote’s

campy, gruesome story “Children on Their Birthdays” into a

Christian family film. Pugh also makes some useful observa-

tions about Capote’s sustained interest in pre-adolescent gay

characters.

Too often, however, Pugh’s research raises questions and

leaves them unanswered. For example, he devotes a whole

chapter to Capote’s failed attempt to make Lee Bouvier Radzi-

will into a movie star by turning the classic 1944 noir film

Laura

into a TV movie in the late ’60s. Radziwill was the sis-

ter of Jackie Kennedy and the wife of a Polish prince, and

Capote seems to have thought that her glamour was sufficient

to compensate for her lack of talent. But why was he so in-

C

OURT

S

TROUD

“Y

OU A BITCH OR WHORE

?” asks

Jamie Brickhouse with a mis-

chievous grin from across the

lacquered coffee table in his trendy Chelsea

flat in New York City. With his copper hair,

black sweater, purple shirt, and indigo

plaid trousers, it’s clear the author of the

new book

Dangerous When Wet

(St. Mar-

tin’s Press) is accustomed to colorful ac-

cents, both on and off the page. As he pours

from the silver teapot, curlicues of steam

spill out of two china cups, each rimmed

with broad bands of emerald and embla-

zoned with campy epithets. With his back

against a velour throw, a zebra-patterned

pillow under one arm, and his tabby Lotte

Lenya at his side, we begin our interview

about the native Texan’s first book, a campy

yet touching memoir about his struggles

with the bottle, his sexuality, and his

mother, Mama Jean.

Court Stroud:

Was it difficult for you

to write so candidly about the three great

loves of your life: booze, sex, and your

mother?

Jamie Brickhouse:

Actually, I don’t love

booze anymore. But my mother—I think

about her every day. Was it hard? Sure, it’s

revealing my own bad behavior. I had to

come to terms with whether I was going to

tell everything. With the alcohol side of

things, I wasn’t so nervous. I had been

sober for some time so that wasn’t such

a hurdle. Talking about my mother,

though? For a while, I felt I might be be-

traying her.

CS:

Was there any pushback from family

members?

JB:

No, there wasn’t. My family was very

supportive about the book. My father gave

me carte blanche. But I had to overcome my

fear that I might betray her by writing about

our relationship or her behavior. The last

hurdle was revealing that I’m HIV-positive,

because I was still in the closet about that.

CS:

In the book, you mention your mother

died not knowing your status.

JB:

I never told her because I wanted to

protect her. I was also, quite frankly, afraid

that she’d say: “Goddammit! I told you so! I

knew this would happen to you!” However,

even if she’d had that reaction at first, she

would’ve gotten over it.

CS:

You struggled about whether to put

your HIV status in the book?

JB:

I had shame about it. I don’t, for the

most part, now. Although I didn’t write this

book as a form of therapy, it’s helped me

come to terms with being HIV-positive. It’s

a disease, a condition, like any other. I de-

cided, in the end, it’s crucial as a conse-

quence of my drinking.

CS:

If you didn’t write the book as a form

of therapy, why did you write

Dangerous

When Wet

?

JB:

Because I wanted to be a writer. I wrote

from the time I was young. I wrote in high

school. I wrote in college. I’ve always

wanted to express myself artistically—and

this was a story I had to tell. I started writ-

ing it in a workshop a year after my mother

died knowing that I wanted to tell this story.

In other words, I had the fire in me to write

this because I had to.

CS:

Your mother tells you to be a writer

during your freshman year of college. Why

Jamie Brickhouse Remembers Mama

ARTIST’S PROFILE