Previous Page  304 / 736 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 304 / 736 Next Page
Page Background

J., that the summons was bad in the following-

respects :

(1) It did not state that the offence was a statu

tory offence referring to the section (Section 115)

or by the addition of the formula "contrary to the

form of the statute in such case made and pro

vided".

(2) It did not state that the particulars were

false to the knowledge of the defendant or mis

leading in a material respect.

(3) There was a

failure

to allege

that the

defendant was required by the Act or by regula

tions thereunder to furnish the particulars.

(4) The District Court Clerk did not in accor

dance with his duty furnish certified copies of

entries in the Justice's Minute Book to the defen

dant.

(5) The validity of

the conviction

is

to be

decided only by reference to entries in the Justice's

Minute Book.

State (Carthew) v District Justice Carr, Sup

reme Court, 22nd November '968.

Road traffic: notice not defective

The defendant was charged under Section 53 of

the Road Traffic Act, 1961. At the outset of the

case in the District Court the solicitor submitted

that the notice of intention served was defective.

The District Justice held that it was and dismissed

the matter. The complainant required the Justice

to state a case to the High Court and it was held

by Mr. Justice Murnaghan that the notice was

defective. The complainant appealed to the Sup

reme Court.

The notice was addressed to Timothy Guerin

and not to James Guerin. Before its service Tim

othy was struck out and James substituted at the

heading of the notice but in the second paragraph

thereof no correction was made. Section 53 re

quires that the notice should give :

(1) The time and place of the alleged offence.

(2) A brief statement of the act or acts alleged

to constitute the offence.

(3) A statement of the intention to prosecute.

In the opinion of the Court the notice notwith

standing the defect in the body thereof where the

wrong name was mentioned, did give all the neces

sary information and consequently complied with

the Section. Accordingly, the District Justice was

not correct in dismissing the summons and the

case should be remitted to the District Justice.

Superintendent McDonnell v Guerin, Supreme

Court, 4th January 1968.

LAND REGISTRY—SQUATTER'S TITLE

The following note has been received from the

Registrar of the Land Registry :

"Where a person claims to be entitled to be

registered as full owner of registered

land by

reason of the possession of the land by him or a

predecessor in title for upwards of twelve years

subsequently to the death of a registered owner,

then notwithstanding the fact that there is an

unproved will of the registered owner purporting

to devise the land to the applicant or a prede

cessor in title the Registrar, provided that legacies

or rights (if any) charged on the land are shown

to have been discharged, spent, or statute barred,

may register the applicant as full owner."

THE REGISTRY

Register C

Information concerning Title Deeds of the property now

the Harrison Hall, Roscommon is sought for Historical

purposes to verify its uses on the following approxi

mate dates:

Prior to 1750—lands of the Earl of Essex.

1750 to 1822—Grand Jury Courthouse.

1836

to 1903—Roman Catholic Church for the

Parish of Roscommon

1912 to date—Harrison (Memorial) Hall.

Please communicate with John R. Sweeney, Solicitor,

Roscommon.

REGISTRATION OF TITLE ACT, 1964

Issue of New Land Certificate

Applications have been received from the registered

owners mentioned in the Schedule annexed hereto, for

the issue of Certificates of Title in substitution for the

original Certificates issued in respect of the lauds speci

fied in the said Schedule, which original Certificates, it

is alleged, have been lost or inadvertently destroyed.

A new Certificate will be issued in each case, except

a case in respect of which notification is received in this

Registry within 28 days from the publication of this

notice, that the Certificate of Title is still in existence,

and

in

the custody of some person other than

the

registered owner. Any such notification should state the

grounds on which such Certificate is being held.

Dated the 18th day of March 1969.

D. L. McALLISTER

Registrar of Titles, Central Office, Land Registry,

Chancery Street, Dublin.

SCHEDULE

1. Registered owner, Peter Brennan. Folio number

12755. County Monaghan. Lands of Annaglogh in the

Barony of Cremorne, containing lla. 2r. 6p.

25