Previous Page  344 / 736 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 344 / 736 Next Page
Page Background

did not know who the lessee was. he could not

continue to act further in those negotiations or

proceedings unless he disclosed the name of the

client for whom he was acting.

His Lordship also considered that the judge's

order for costs against all three gentlemen, in

cluding the solicitor, was properly made, although

it was not known who the client was or whether

the solicitor was acting as a solicitor and not as

a party. The solicitor had brought it all on him

self by the course he thought fit to adopt. The

appeal should be dismissed.

(Pascall v. Galinski [1969] 3 W.L.R. 626.)

Failure to use red warning light

stationary fire

engine at night

The plaintiff was a young motor cyclist who held

a provisional driving licence and usually wore

spectacles when he rode his motor cycle. At just

after 5 p.m. in broad daylight on a July evening

he was riding his motor cycle in heavy rain, which

was so bad that he could not wear his spectacles,

when he ran into a stationary fire engine, as a

result of which he sustained personal injuries.

The local fire brigade had been called out to

deal with a fire and the fire engine had been

properly parked on the road for only two minutes

before the accident happened. The driver had set

two blue lights on the top of the fire engine

flashing so as to warn oncoming traffic of its

presence, but he had not put out the red warning-

lamp on the road so as to give early warning

to approaching traffic. The plaintiff, if he had

kept a proper look-out, should have seen the fire

engine when he was 80 yards away. He claimed

damages against the local authority. The trial

judge, Commissioner Temple Morris, found that

the plaintiff and the local authority were equally

to blame for the accident : the plaintiff in failing

to keep a proper look out and take avoiding

action and the local authority for the failure of

the driver of the fire engine to place a red warning

lamp on the road in front of the engine. He

accordingly awarded the plaintiff £809 11s.

damages.

On appeal by the local authority.

Held by the Court of Appeal (Sellers. L. J.,

Danckwerts, L. J. and Baker, J.) allowing the

appeal, that, since the first duty of the fire brigade

was to protect those in peril from the fire the

driver of the fire engine was not guilty of negli

gence in omitting to place a red warning lamp

on the road, for the flashing of the blue lights

on top of the fire engine was a sufficient indica

tion to oncoming traffic of the presence of the

fire engine; and that, accordingly, there was no

negligence on the part of the fire brigade and the

plaintiffs' claim for damages failed.

(Amos. v. Glamorgan County Council. Novem

ber 20th, 1967. 1967 66 L.G.R. 166).

APPRENTICES' FORUM

The Hospitalisation of the Law Society

No sooner had the announcement that the In

corporated Law Society of Ireland had purchased

the King's Hospital as its new headquarters been

made than speculators and commentators pub

lished their views on various aspects of its adop

tion and adaptation.

The Building was designed by one, Thomas

Ivory, who started life as a carpenter in Cork.

This means that the Law Society will be able to

continue its great tradition of operating within an

Ivory Tower. Furthermore, the building was

erected between 1773 and 1783, and its architec

ture is therefore very much in keeping with the

period when our present system of apprentice

ship was devised. However, when the new Law

School is established in the King's Hospital, there

will be no pressure on apprentices to wear Blue

Coats.

The main feature of the new Law School will

be the fact that legal subjects will actually be

taught and learned by professors and students

respectively, instead of the present lecture system.

Also, since the King's Hospital was founded by

Charter in the reign of Charles II, it is hoped to

commemorate this event by having special student

charter flights each summer from the rear lawn.

There will also be some recreational facilities

for apprentices. For instance, the billiard room

should be especially instructive for students of

cannon law. A cafeteria will sell specially manu

factured "Donnoghue v. Stevenson" Ginger Beer,

and the gymnasium should prove beneficial to

those run down by running down actions.

The chapel is to be maintained as such, and

an apprentices' choir will be formed. Anyone

wishing to sing in a minor key will have to enter

into a tenancy agreement for the letting of a flat.

The tennis courts at the rear will enable the

Chief Justice to appoint Commissioners for Oaths

of the Tennis Court. It should be noted that there

is not truth in the rumour that the entire project

is being financed by Debentures of the Kings

Inns, but Bar students hope to open a lounge.

The Four Courts Library will be removed (lock,

stock and librarian) to the King's Hospital, and

it is hoped to use a novel indexing system where

by students and practitioners alike will be able to

actually find the books they are looking for.

64