Previous Page  60 / 736 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 60 / 736 Next Page
Page Background

felt necessities of the time and be willing to

change and initiate change.

"To this end the Council have decided to invite

a guest speaker to address the members of

the

bodies affiliated to the Federation on the subject

of "The Professions in a Changing Society". The

speaker invited to undertake this task is Mr. John

Marsh,

the

present Director-General

of

the

British Institute of Management, a former Direc

tor of the Industrial Welfare Society and of the

Institute of Personnel Management. Mr. Marsh

has made a particular study of this problem. He

holds, and has held, many posts and has been

associated with many projects

in British public

life which admirably fit him

to undertake

this

task. The address will be given at the Hibernian

Hotel at 8.0 p.m. on Monday the 4th December

next."

A good representation at this meeting by mem

bers of the Society will enhance the kgal pro

fession's role in the Federation. Further infor

mation can be had from the Honorary Secretary,

Mr. Franklin J. O'Sullivan, (Solicitor), Federa

tion of Professional Associations, 22, Clyde Road,

Ballsbridge, Dublin, 4.

REGISTERED LAND

DISCHARGE FROM DEATH DUTIES

A Member acted for a vendor who acquired

freehold registered

land

(of which he

is

now-

registered full owner) on the death intestate of

his father, the previous registered owner, who

died over twelve years ago. Letters of Adminis

tration of the- father's estate - issued more than

twelve yers ago. The solicitor for the purchaser

insisted that the vendor should furnish a certifi

cate of discharge from death duties in the estate

of his late father, despite the fact that the death

occurred more than a period of twelve years ago.

Notwithstanding the fact that the land is regis

tered land, such land is real estate for all other

purposes. The Succession Act,

1965

does not

affect this position. The death on the title could

have given rise to claims for both succession duty

and estate duty.

Succession Duty :

Under section 42 of the Succession Duty Act.

1853 this is a charge.

A purchaser from the successor is not, however,

personally accountable but the charge does, of

course, affect the property in his hands, subject to

the following :—

Section 12 of the Customs and Inland Revenue

Act, 1889, provided that notwithstanding section

42 of the Succession Duty Act, 1853, "real-pro

perty, or any estate or interest therein, shall not,

as regards a purchaser for valuable consideration

.

.

. remain charged with or liable to payment of

any sum for Succession Duty .

.

. after the expira

tion of twelve years from the happening of the

event; .

.

. which gave rise to the immediate claim

to such duty ..."

The protection

so given

to a purchaser

is

absolute. It is immaterial whether he has or has

not notice of a claim.

Estate Duty :—

Section 8(3) of the Finance Act, 1894, makes

the executor of

the deceased

the only person

accountable for the Estate Duty on the

personal

estate of which the deceased was competent

to

dispose.

As regards any other property—and this inclu

des the lands in question—section 8(4) casts a

very wide net which brings in,

inter alias,

"every

person

in whom

(the property)

is vested

in

possession by alienation or other derivative title"

and section 9(1) makes the duty a charge on such

property.

A purchaser of real estate

is

therefore faced

with personal accountability [under section 8(4)]

and a charge on his property

[under section

9(1)].

Section 8(2) of the 1894 Act provides, however,

that section

12

of

the Customs and

Inland

Revenue Act,

1889

(referred

to above)

"shall

apply as if Estate Duty were therein mentioned as

well as Succession Duty". Consequently, real pro

perty does not remain charged with or liable to

payment of Estate Duty as against a purchaser for

valuable consideration after

the expiration of

twelve years from the death which gave rise to the

claim. Then, the question of notice is irrelevant.

The relieving provision applies to the charge

only and does not touch the question of personal

accountability. However, where section 8(2) app

lies it is the official practice to treat the purchaser

as completely in the clear.

In Green's Death Duties, 6th ed., page 558, the

following helpful observation is made :—"In cases

of uncertainty the prudent course for the pur

chaser's solicitor is to place

the facts

(i.e.

the

actual names, dates, etc) before the Estate Duty

Office and to enquire whether the purchaser will

be affected by any claim."

RESTRICTIVE CONDITIONS OF SALE

The following headnote from the re

port o

f a

case—In re Marsh Granville

(24 Ch.

p.ll)

is

brought to the attention of members.

A contract entered into in 1882 for the sale of

52