Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  73 / 532 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 73 / 532 Next Page
Page Background

THE EXISTANCE OF THE RIGHT TO HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE …

country.

66

There is no doubt that a State has an obligation to ensure the respect for

the right to life of individuals within its territory and within its prerogatives. This,

inter alia

, implies an obligation of the State to take active measures and all necessary

steps for the fulfilment of the right to life also in the aftermath of natural disasters.

‘Taking all necessary steps’ means that the State has the duty to prevent disasters, to

prepare for disasters within its territory, to take direct measures to minimize suffering

immediately following a disaster, and above all to seek international humanitarian relief

when national efforts are insufficient to preserve lives of victims of natural disasters.

The right to humanitarian assistance is thus a necessary element of the right to life with

dignity, encompassing the right to an adequate standard of living, including adequate

food, water, clothing, shelter and the requirements of good health, which are expressly

guaranteed under international law. Although many basic human rights applicable in

the event of natural disasters are generally considered subject to ‘progressive realization’

over time, it is considered that the affected State, by arbitrarily rejecting available

international humanitarian assistance that would be essential for the survival and well-

being of the victims in the event of natural disasters, violates these rights.

In addition, efforts to establish the existence of the right to humanitarian

assistance in the event of natural disasters can be influenced by the fact that this

right is widely recognized in the specialized context of armed conflicts.

International

humanitarian law provides a useful analogy in inferring the rules governing response

to natural disasters. The universally accepted legal rules

of ‘Geneva Law’ explicitly

deal with the scope and provision of the right to humanitarian assistance. It should be

noted that there is no absolute agreement that a customary norm has so far crystallized

in international law of armed conflict to establish a general right to humanitarian

assistance which would apply to all situations.

67

In the case of occupied territories such

a right does exist and an occupying power has the unconditional obligation to enable

relief consignments to reach civilian population in need. For other cases of armed

conflicts it must be taken into account that, although humanitarian assistance is to be

provided in agreement with Parties concerned, such agreement must not be withheld

on arbitrary grounds. The commentaries to the Protocol Additional to the Geneva

Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-

International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II) note:

“The fact that consent is required does not mean that the decision is left to the discretion

of the parties. If the survival of the population is threatened and a humanitarian

organization fulfilling the required conditions of impartiality and non-discrimination

is able to remedy this situation, relief actions must take place.

66

Ramcharan, B. G.,

The Right to Life in International Law

, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht,

1985, pp. 6, 17.

67

Dinstein, Y.,

The Right to Humanitarian Assistance

,

available at:

http://ihl.ihlresearch.org/index.

cfm?fuseaction=page. viewPage&pageID=808&nodeID=2