56 / 1674
Authors
N Analysis MX CESM
Dromain, 2011 110 Per
patient
78 % 92%
Fallenberg,
2014
107 Per
patient
77,9% 94,7%
Mokhtar, 2014 60 Per
patient
93,2% 97,7%
Lobbes, 2014 113 Per
patient
96,9% 100%
Tardivel, RSNA
2014
195 Per lesion
94%
Jochelson,
2012
52 Per
patient
Per lesion
81%
59%
96%
83%
Dromain, RSNA
2011
53 Per
patient
Per lesion
NA 94%
93%
Fallenberg,
2013
80 Per
patient
81% 100%
Se CESM 92-100% > Se MG
Se does not vary with breast density
(≠ MG)
Fallenberg et al Breast
Cancer Res Treat 2014
107 patients, 56
dense (BI-RADS
C / D)
3 radiologists
Clinical Performance : CESM vs MG