Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  179 / 507 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 179 / 507 Next Page
Page Background

Chapter 4: Inherited Benefits: Advising Executors and Beneficiaries

179

5.6 )

. Although certain “regular contributions” to IRAs can be recharacterized, most

recharacterizations will involve undoing Roth IRA “conversions”

(¶ 5.4) ;

the rest of this

¶ 4.1.02

deals with the post-mortem recharacterization of a Roth conversion done by the decedent.

This discussion assumes that the decedent died prior to the deadline for recharacterizing

his Roth conversion; see

¶ 5.6.02 .

According to the regulations, the recharacterization election

“may be made on behalf of a deceased IRA owner by his or her executor, administrator, or other

person responsible for filing the final Federal income tax return of the decedent under section

6012(b)(1).” Reg.

§ 1.408A-5 ,

A-6(c).

Although this sounds reasonable, there is a significant “mechanical” problem with the

regulation’s approach. A recharacterization is accomplished by transferring the conversion

contribution, plus earnings thereon, out of the Roth IRA and into a traditional IRA by means of an

IRA-to-IRA transfer. See

¶ 5.6.03 .

Unless the estate is the beneficiary of the Roth IRA, it is not

clear how the executor will persuade the IRA sponsor to transfer the money to a different IRA

when the executor does not have title to the account; the beneficiary owns the account from the

moment the participant dies.

¶ 4.2.01 .

IRA sponsors could alleviate this “mechanical” problem (and gift tax concerns; see below)

by including in their IRA documents a provision to the effect that, if the sponsor receives timely

notice from the deceased participant’s executor that any contribution to the account is being

recharacterized, the sponsor will forthwith transfer the contribution in question (plus or minus

earnings thereon) to an IRA of the other type, with the same IRA sponsor, and with terms identical

(except as required to reflect that it is the other type of IRA) to the existing account; and that the

beneficiary designation applicable to the original IRA will also apply to the account created by the

recharacterization. The IRS could help by including such a provision in its Forms 5305 and 5305-

A (sample IRA/Roth IRA documents). See PLR 2002-34074 in which an IRA sponsor proceeded

in that manner (presumably without the benefit of having such language in its documents).

If such a provision is not included in the IRA sponsor’s documents, the estate planner

should consider including it in the beneficiary designation form. See

¶ 5.8.06

for other issues the

estate planner should consider in connection with Roth conversions and recharacterizations.

However, this solution is neither simple nor foolproof:

The documents would need to protect the IRA provider by providing a mechanism for it to

determine with finality who is the “executor” entitled to make this election; the amount of

the recharacterized contribution and the earnings thereon; and whether the

recharacterization was done within the applicable deadline.

If the beneficiary cashes out the Roth IRA before the executor recharacterizes the

contribution to it, the executor loses the ability to recharacterize. Recharacterization

requires an IRA-to-IRA transfer, which can’t be done once the account has been

distributed. See

¶ 5.6.03 (

A)(1). This seems to be a trump card held by the beneficiary,

unless the plan documents provide that the beneficiary may not withdraw from the account

prior to the recharacterization deadline without the executor’s consent.

Because of this “mechanical” problem, the IRS might have to revise its regulation to

specify that the beneficiary (rather than the executor) has the power to recharacterize the Roth